Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-03 06:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2162 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2162 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 081 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:01 am (UTC)(link)In other news: why is the fact that it's "New Progressive Spiderman" (read: not a white guy) getting the blame, and not that it's...I don't know, poorly marketed, badly written, etc? Like whenever a movie headlined by a woman fails it's because IT WAS ABOUT A WOMAN, MEN DON'T WATCH THAT but tons of films with guys as the lead characters fail and...that's never the cause. It's just 'cause the movies suck.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:05 am (UTC)(link)The tanking of the comic probably had more to do with people's nostalgic bond with "Peter Parker as Spiderman" and poor marketing decisions.
But you know somebody's still gonna say: "WELP I GUESS NOBODY WANTS TO READ ABOUT BLACK PEOPLE."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:15 am (UTC)(link)I mean, just because I share an ethnicity with a character doesn't mean I like or have anything else in common with them. I don't think white people are expected to love all white characters.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:50 am (UTC)(link)Like if I said I didn't like this black character but I like this other character who is a carbon copy but he's white, something seems really off about that.
Also, I think it could be poor marketing as to why it's tanking and too much damn nostalgia.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-04 05:16 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 05:08 am (UTC)(link)It's a no win, and it really stupid.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:08 am (UTC)(link)Thank you for saying it far more accurately and eloquently than I could.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 12:11 am (UTC)(link)Here's the thing: Ultimate Spiderman has consistently been the best selling comic in the Ultimate comic line. It was good. Very good. And when they decided to end it, they did a great job with it!
And then they are all "wait, it's not over yet! New Spiderman It's gonna be just as good!" And at first, it was! Now it's not.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 02:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 02:45 am (UTC)(link)And I've not been called racist that much here. I was called it then. When I said this.
And unlike the ones who said it'd be good, I was right. I'm a nerd. Being right about this sort of thing is the most important thing.
And who said that had nothing to do with it? Maybe it wasn't pandering, maybe it was. But lets not pretend people didn't see it that way. And didn't like the idea of killing off one character to try again with that character lite but younger and more diverse.
I gave it a chance. It disappointed me. You can say that's because I'm racist if you are so convinced. But I was still right.
And be honest, do you even read it?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 03:33 am (UTC)(link)Frankly it sounds like with comics these days, even good for a little while is above average.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-04 21:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-04 23:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 02:30 am (UTC)(link)I've been reading it!
I'm a little behind because I'm running low on money right now (so maybe I haven't reached where it got less-good? For me captain America has just shown up which I'm :| about 'cause I don't like him and Miles is trying to join the Ultimates and while I prefer him to continue to work alone, I don't mind seeing where that goes). But I've been quietly enjoying it. I haven't really commented about it on FS because I don't think I've seen any other secrets about him and haven't felt the need to make a secret because none of my reactions so far have been secret-worthy.
I haven't really been involved in any discussions because they always end up into arguments about how Miles is a political correctedness stunt (so what? It's bad to even out the races in comics?), if he flunks it's obviously because he's black and not poor advertising or writing (mind you, I'm enjoying the story and art) and I'm getting tired of needing to justify why I like Morales more than Parker (who I never liked anyway so...).
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 02:49 am (UTC)(link)Mostly in the circles I'm in, it's Bendis hate more then anything.
I really don't like the whole ultimate's thing myself. Issue 17 is making me consider dropping the title completely. Assuming the title itself isn't dropped completely at the rate it's going.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-04 03:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-04 03:42 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Which, for me makes it even iffier on the side of "OMG NOT WITHOUT PETER PARKER!" argument. :\
*cough*
... Peter Parker just died in 616. With implications that even if he comes back, he won't be spiderman anymore (superior spiderman is by all indications Miguel O'Hara)
BIG ASS SPOILER PICTURE BELOW!
(He has a heart attack and flatlines on the next page)
Re: *cough*
I give it six months.
Re: *cough*
Re: *cough*
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 02:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: *cough*
Re: *cough*
Re: *cough*
Re: *cough*
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-04 05:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: *cough*
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 01:31 am (UTC)(link)I didn't even know this was even a thing!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-04 02:47 am (UTC)(link)I guess Robins count since Batman's sidekick is always Robin. It seems weird to me that there's so many of them.
Here I'd say I don't know how much of the writing can be bad since it's the same writer that wrote the entire Ultimate Spider-man run with Peter before it. So maybe people just don't like Miles as a character. I can't rule race out as some factor in it but I wouldn't say it was the only reason.
no subject
Likewise, Flash's Rogues occasionally do a legacy thing, though Mirror Master, Trickster, and for a little while Captain Boomerang are the only successful ones out of the bunch (unless you count Lisa dressing up each boyfriend after the Top as Chillblaine). Robin and Batgirl as legacy characters make sense, because they're symbols in Gotham. The Atom worked as a legacy character for the same reason Jaime's Blue Beetle was successful--the characters had a lot of respect for their predecessors, and in Choi's case, he was tapped to be the new one by Palmer.
All that said, I think legacy heroes generally work(ed) better in DC, because until recently, DC had more of a sense of history and growth to it.