[ SECRET POST #227 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #227 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.



Notes:

Things to click as usual? (:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 101 secrets from Secret Submission Post #033.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Tuesday, August 21st, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: 17

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know what it is you're trying to argue. Are you actually trying to deny that we live in a heteronormative society? Pulling out specific exceptions like CLAMP or saying your fandoms are different does nothing to detract from my point; you're talking micro-level, I'm talking macro-level. The series I chose for examples on the bottom are all mainstream, marketed for the masses. Death Note and Naruto ran in Jump, the most widely-read shounen magazine in Japan. House airs during prime time on a major network. KH is partly owned by Disney. It is very unlikely for slash pairings to become canon in these kinds of series. Not entirely impossible (as I said in reply to someone else, Willow/Tara from Buffy the Vampire Slayer are an example). But anyone who thinks that het isn't far more likely is kidding themselves.

Re: 17

[apapazukamori.livejournal.com]

*shrug* Not exactly talking micro-level when bringing CLAMP up as an example. Tsubasa runs in Weekly Shounen Magazine, the #2 magazine behind Shounen Jump. A handful of their other series ran in Monthly ASUKA, another mainstream magazine.

I was trying to point out just what I said. The likelihood of a straight or gay pairing in a series really depends on the series, genre and fandom. Sometimes claiming subtext as canon doesn't work. Sometimes it does. Pulling away from canon to a preferred fanon subtext doesn't make canon not exist. However, when you have a series that is pure subtext, you have to look at the genre/audience/creator. Making a blanket statement that the subtext or interaction is going to become straight or gay does a disservice to things like character development, setting, plot, etc.

Is House going to get in bed with Wilson? Probably not. But if/when the ratings are going down the tubes and FOX doesn't care if they jump the shark, who says the writers might not have them get completely plastered and wake up together one morning?

Re: 17

[apapazukamori.livejournal.com]

And, just for the record, Disney is an incredibly gay-friendly company.