case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-05 05:21 pm

[ SECRET POST #2164 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2164 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 044 secrets from Secret Submission Post #309.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
oroburos69: (Default)

[personal profile] oroburos69 2012-12-05 11:40 pm (UTC)(link)
Isn't cis just a word for not transgendered?

Because damn, die cis scum covers a ton of ground. Like, 99.9& of the world--wait, I can actually check that! Okay, according to a single site (first google result), that covers 99.99% of the population, ish.

You can't deny that they have ambition. Severely misplaced ambition, but nevertheless, ambition.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2012-12-06 12:07 am (UTC)(link)
Even if 99.99% of the population were wiped out in some catastrophic event, CIS PEOPLE WOULD STILL BE PART OF the .01%. (Did I do math right?) That's a scary thought, huh?
oroburos69: (Default)

[personal profile] oroburos69 2012-12-06 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
Weeeell...we're trying to kill them all, here. If we succeeded, then they simply wouldn't exist.

insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2012-12-06 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
if anything, there are good odds tiny groups like that were wiped out completely.

Armageddon probably won't take proportionate chunks out of the population.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2012-12-06 03:11 am (UTC)(link)
Armageddon probably won't take proportionate chunks out of the population.

Mine would.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2012-12-06 04:07 am (UTC)(link)
Well when you figure out the logistics of it, lemme know. I'll have to get in good with you at your evil lair of doom.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2012-12-06 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
You could get in with me in my evil lair, but I'd never tell you the logistics of my evil plan(s). When you are a genocidal maniac, you can't trust anyone. I'll find something for you to do that doesn't involve knowing my plans. Don't worry.
nyxelestia: Rose Icon (Default)

[personal profile] nyxelestia 2012-12-06 06:45 am (UTC)(link)
Well, you might have to share enough of them for us to coordinate our Armageddon plans efficiently.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-06 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
Well, it would get rid of the problem of overpopulation. As well as probably getting rid of civilization and, eventually, humans in general...
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2012-12-06 03:02 am (UTC)(link)
That won't solve shit!

What evolves from Cockroaches will be just as flawed as we are. Only maybe they'll judge by shell hue or mandible size.
fuchsiascreams: (Default)

[personal profile] fuchsiascreams 2012-12-07 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
Those tiny-mandible'd douchebags!

(Anonymous) 2012-12-06 09:17 am (UTC)(link)
No, cisgender means that you identify with the gender you were assigned at birth. To say it just means "not trans" ignores that there are (rather common) many other combinations of sex/gender identity that don't neatly or easily amount to being trans or not trans. For example, see intersex and the fact that some transpeople consider themselves cisgender when they feel that their body matches their gender identity.
oroburos69: (Default)

[personal profile] oroburos69 2012-12-06 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Weird. The site I checked said that transgendered was a blanket term for all of those things.