[ SECRET POST #2169 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2169 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #310.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[ariakas]

No, your theory makes no sense because it has literally no evidence behind it whatsoever, and at least one counterexample I could immediately bring to bear - as I made implicitly clear in my response. It's just something you made up, with a hedging clause to explain away any and all of those who take issue with it, because they disagree and it is not the case for them.

Which is sheer intellectual cowardice, because now anyone who responds to you, as I did, as a counterexample, will be written off as not falling under the "most" - rather, they will be "the exception", so you have conveniently set yourself up with a theory that cannot be proven wrong, because it is what you want to believe about those who disagree with you.

/sigh

I did not misread your first statement. I could, however, have explicitly rather than implicitly made clear the intent behind my counter claim, because you clearly did not understand it - and clarity is important when holding a discussion in writing.