Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-18 06:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #2177 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2177 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #311.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
You say it's ego on behalf of male geeks. Could it also be insecurity? Because they can't wrap their heads around how someone pretty could also like geeky things because deep down they self hate because they believe what they do makes them an outsider in society? So why would someone who is conventionally pretty, therefore, in their eyes, fit better with the mainstream, do something that would make them an outsider too? So, therefore, these pretty girls MUST be faking.
no subject
no subject
But really it's about putting women down because of those male geeks' own insecurities. If you're not "hot", you're an ugly bitch who shouldn't be there. If you are "hot" you're a fake geek girl who shouldn't be there.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-19 02:00 am (UTC)(link)This.
no subject
Exactly. That's exactly what I've seen in (comics) geek culture. Unless you can stand there, quoting every issue number and story arc and entire character histories, gtfo. And if you CAN do that and you're attractive, extra gtfo because you're rubbing it into the insecure geek man-children.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think a lot of geeks, myself included, grow up in that social dead zone. Maybe you look awkward, probably act awkward, are seen as weird for the attitudes, if not the hobbies, that make you a geek.
And you get this idea, even subconsciously, that to be a Geek, one must Suffer. A football player can't be a Geek--they're a Jock. A pretty girl can't be a geek--she's a Prep. Or maybe just a Pretty Girl. Or--gasp!--Popular. In fact, if she's pretty, she's probably Popular, and we have this kneejerk reaction left over from our school days that says Popular People are the Enemy.
It's pathetic and more or less entirely informed by lousy movies from the 80's and 90's. But it's still there for a lot of people, and usually requires becoming consciously aware of how ridiculous it is to stop thinking that way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-19 04:57 pm (UTC)(link)http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/4969-Words-for-Nerds
And then he responded to the fake geek girls thing by doing a 3-part series on Supergirl that starts with a glorious rant.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/videos/view/the-big-picture/6552-Original-Geek-Girl
no subject