case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-18 06:35 pm

[ SECRET POST #2177 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2177 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #311.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-19 12:40 am (UTC)(link)
the whole argument relies on identifying what people's intentions and inner attitude is (which is really fucking difficult) and drawing really hard and fast, bright lines about what allows one to identify as a geek (also really fucking difficult). and, furthermore, the whole argument about it is very often rooted in either misogyny or resentment - I mean, seriously, how often is the argument NOT rooted in that? especially the well-developed form of the argument (& the reason the argument includes girls and not boys) which is that 'fake geek girls' are only out there to draw attention by being sexy and attracting gamers, or somehow to get their claws into lonely geek boys.

so, hey, maybe there are fake geek girls (and boys) out there. but it's almost impossible to tell who is a "fake" and who's not, and caring a whole lot about it and getting stirred up with animus on account of it is, it seems to me, almost always the result of some heavy negative emotional shit on the part of the person getting angry, which doesn't really justify the action.

so tl;dr let people do what they're going to do. it's impossible to tell whether they're "fake" or "real" and I don't see any real reason to care either way. Are they a good person? Treats people decently, says interesting things? then I don't give a shit whether they're "fake" or not.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2012-12-19 10:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Photobucket