[ SECRET POST #2177 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2177 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #311.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

...So how exactly are attractive women who like dressing up as Batgirl or Princess Peach worse than entertainment industry bigwigs like Chuck Lorre who market to geeks mostly because geeks are more likely to spend more money on collectibles and memorabilia for TV shows? Pretty sure the Two And A Half Men guy doesn't actually give two shits about Star Wars: The Old Republic or particle physics, and he's making money off geeks, so why exactly does he get a pass while women who're spending her own time and money making costumes and buying gaming equipment get crucified for being "fake?"