[ SECRET POST #2181 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[cloud_riven]

Agreeing with anon: this

I'd rather even negative representations exist, because I simply want there to be a range of them. Dudes are typically allowed to be flawed, dull, weak, and generally fail as characters/leads all the time, so why is it seen like a writer only has ONE shot to get everyone else right.

[cherrycoloured.livejournal.com]

I admit I'm a little confused by your comment. Do you mean like a writer fails to portray a certain group correctly, or characters with intentional flaws?

[cloud_riven]

By flawed here, I actually meant bad. As in bad characters. Or not compelling. flat. Boring.

[(Anonymous)]

not oc, but it seems like minority characters have to be absolutely flawless in order to pass the fandom test, whereas your standard white dude can have as many flaws as he wants, because apparently every minority character is The Official Representative Of All Minorities Ever and can't have any problems or else the creator MUST be saying that all minorities are like that.

[(Anonymous)]

It's because a lot of the time, that one minority character is the only person of their particular group, which makes it a lot more loaded. If you have six white male characters on a show, it really doesn't mean much if one of the characters is an absolutely evil asshole. If you only have one black female character on the show (for example) it IS a lot worse to make her be an absolutely evil asshole because she's essentially the "token."

I don't really hear a lot of people complaining about the sexism in making Jenna an ~evil bitch~ on Pretty Little Liars, and I think a lot of that has to do with the fact that her character is more than balanced out by the many strong female protagonists on the show. Her character would take on a different flavor if instead of Aria, Hanna, Emily, and Spencer, we had Adam, Hansel, Emmitt, and...okay, Spencer.