case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-22 03:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #2181 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
gabzillaz: (Kero)

[personal profile] gabzillaz 2012-12-23 03:57 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the "it's a scandinavian fairy tale" is a weak excuse when they changed almost everything about the original story.

Actually, is a weak excuse even without that. TLK was Hamlet with lions. Aladdin is chinese in the original story.

That aside, the concept looks like Tangled 2.0. and I find it really boring.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 05:11 am (UTC)(link)
Um, no, Aladdin is not Chinese. It's based off the Middle-Eastern folk tale, "Aladdin and the Magic Lamp."

The Lion King was lions, yeah. Because of obvious connections between lions and royalty, I imagine, and the popularity of animal characters. It was set in Africa, sure, but the characters aren't POC. They are literally lions, and being in Africa is a result of that, not an attempt to create ethnic diversity.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 08:28 am (UTC)(link)
I was personally under the impression that gabzillaz only meant to assert the fact that the character of Aladdin, rather than the story itself, is said to be of Chinese origin in the Middle Eastern source material.
gabzillaz: (Kero)

[personal profile] gabzillaz 2012-12-23 01:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Aladdin was a middle-eastern folk tale... set in China, and Aladdin was chinese.

The point is that they changed the setting to Africa, and they could have changed the setting of Frozen to another place, since they changed the story so much already.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-23 07:44 am (UTC)(link)
And Esmerelda was fair skinned, having a white mother and an unspecified father. The Princess in "The Frog Princess" the book "Princess and the Frog" was based on was from bullshit made up country and was white.

Disney has changed races in original stories from white to "PoC" in the past. People are either ignorant of that fact or refuse to acknowledge it.

And honestly they change a lot about pretty much ever adaptive tale they have done.

Could they have made her not white? Of course. Are they required to? No.
gabzillaz: (Kero)

[personal profile] gabzillaz 2012-12-23 01:18 pm (UTC)(link)

Of course they are ot required to. Doesn't mean people can't critisize them for not even trying.