Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-22 03:14 pm
[ SECRET POST #2181 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2181 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 100 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 1 2 (again) - repeat ], [ 4 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
By your logic, the only reason Disney is better is because it's been making movies since the 30s.
What.
Or the fact that in the last twenty-three years (since Little Mermaid, which kicked off the renaissance), nine out of twenty-five of their movies (and nine out of eighteen that actually star humans) have had POC in lead roles, which while not perfect, is a record that no other Western company can even come close to touching.
no subject
Disney has been making movies for a long time. They have more movies than either Dreamworks or Pixar, which is one of the reasons they have more movies starring POCs.
no subject
Disney has made less movies in the past twenty years (which is what I was pulling the POC number from) than DW has made in the whole of its existence. Pixar is the same. You can't go by number of years when DW puts out multiple films a year and the others put out only one (if that). It gives an inaccurate ratio.
Disney in the last twenty years- twenty-two movies, nine POC leads.
Dreamworks since their inception- twenty-five movies, two POC leads.
Or even-
Disney since 1998 (which is the year DW released its first film)- seventeen films, six POC leads.
DW since 1998- See above.
This doesn't include Disney's fairies franchise, which has Latina, Asian, and black characters.
Disney's been around a longer time, but by ratio of film they've still done better on the ethnic minority (and female lead) front. I don't even see how this is an argument. They've been the most progressive Western animation studio when it comes to inclusion by far.
no subject
We can go by the amount of movies, which is what you were using against Dreamworks in comparison to Pixar. Disney has made more movies than Dreamworks, so yeah, they have more PoC. But this logic is faulty, since a lot of early Disney films were made in a time were a PoC lead would have been unlikely.
DW has had Prince of Egypt (no white person in sight), Joseph, Sinbad, Spirit and the Road to el Dorado. And if they don't change the source material, The True Meaning of Smekday will have a poc female lead. Pixar has the two characters that I mentioned. I was arguing against your "Pixar is better than Dreamworks in representation" No, they really aren't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-24 06:51 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-01 05:41 am (UTC)(link)(Again, sorry for posting to a dead thread, but again, LOVE for that book but no one to talk about it with.)
no subject