case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2012-12-24 09:42 pm

[ SECRET POST #2183 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2183 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Sorry for late, overslept.

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 04:47 am (UTC)(link)
Yeesh, like when they shelved, delayed, or severely edited all those movies with violence after Columbine.

Putting out an official warning that the movie contains a scene with gangsters shooting up a movie theater strikes me as a more appropriate response instead of cutting it out and pretending it was never there.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 07:53 am (UTC)(link)
This. Fiction is not reality, and if some people have an issue with it, they can just not go see those movies. I hate this whole idea that whenever something bad like that happens, suddenly the WHOLE WORLD must be censored as a result.

How about not? Let individuals make their own decisions, we don't need other people to make them for us.

(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
...Except that it's the producers making their own decisions?

I don't entirely disagree with you, but self-censoring is an entirely different kettle of fish than censorship imposed from outside. They have every right as creators to decide they no longer want to include a planned scene, and 'societal context changed' is as valid a reason as 'didn't screen well with test audiences' or '...nah, I'm just not feeling it'.