Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-24 09:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #2183 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2183 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Sorry for late, overslept.
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Should people who post stuff online be prepared for the fact that not every response will be positive? Yep. They should, and maybe as they mature they'll get stronger and be able to handle it. This does not mean it's my job to ~toughen them up. Conversely, the well-meaning people who feel the need to critique everything "for your own good" also ought to be able to see that not everyone is like them.
Is it so hard to understand that while revising and editing, critiquing and re-thinking and trying again, is fun for me (and it is), for a lot of people it's work and not fun at all? Why is it such a problem to determine which kind of person you're talking to before you dump a load of "How to Improve" on them?
This is why I never make concrit my first interaction with someone. Even if they're the kind of person who likes critique, I need to know if I'm someone they care to hear from. Yes, yes, I know: EVERYONE STOP WHINING, YOU ARE GOING TO GET NEGATIVE FEEDBACK FROM RANDOM PEOPLE SO LEARN TO DEAL. True, but that does not mean I have to be one of those random people. I'd rather respect other writers (and myself) enough to find out first if my input is wanted.
Even if the answer is yes, I prefer to give and receive critique in PM or in locked posts, rather than in public comments. It spares the dignity of the writer, and spares the critic from the anger of other readers.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 08:09 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Not to mention, if I am the one doing the critiquing, it's very possible that I will have misread, accidentally a paragraph somewhere, or come up with a really boneheaded suggestion that I have to take back. This happens, and I would rather it didn't happen in public.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 08:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-26 03:44 am (UTC)(link)