Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-24 09:42 pm
[ SECRET POST #2183 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2183 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Sorry for late, overslept.
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 067 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-25 07:56 pm (UTC)(link)Honestly, it would just be kind of nice if fandom had some sort of bi-annual seminar on criticism and peer review so everyone on all sides understood what did and didn't constitute concrit and people could be a lot less wanky about it (people in general there - not aimed at you! Your comment was not wanky).
And the example you gave with your beta is good, and I think really shows how helpful having a good beta that you have a good relationship with can be. Even if you don't necessarily follow their suggestions to the letter, it still helps you learn overall. But unsolicited critique given by strangers isn't exactly the same thing. A lot of that can be wonderful, but it's not the same (in most cases) as what you'd have with a beta. A beta is often times someone you have a personal relationship with and they're generally pretty familiar with your style (or they get there in the end) and they're much more thorough when they go through things. Just because of the nature of beta-ing, there's usually more of a chance of back and forth and a lot of times it just feels more reciprocal. It's also a bit easier as an author, at least in my experience, to accept certain types of criticism from a beta because you know they're someone who usually has a bit of familiarity with your work or, at the very least, is experienced in editing. Not that people who offer concrit in comments aren't, but it's a bit harder to know.
This is getting really long and rambly, but basically I agree with you. I just think that there's misunderstanding on both sides of the issue, and that it's not really as cut and dry as "concrit is always good and people should just accept it and stop whining!" as some of the other commenters in this thread try to make it seem.