Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-12-26 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2185 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2185 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

[not a repeat; was broken yesterday]
__________________________________________________
16.

[not a repeat; was broken yesterday]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #312.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[not a repeat; was broken yesterday]
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-26 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)I feel the same way you do, nonnie, especially in shows where the romance is about as subtle as an anvil hitting you on the head.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
Personally, I like it in some cases, but it annoys me in others. What mostly bugs me is that there aren't nearly enough well-written friendships (especially male-female ones) to balance it out.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 12:56 am (UTC)(link)And, essentially, if one wants a romance-free work, they should go take a look at books or films. It's not a TV thing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 04:03 am (UTC)(link)(though there's still an awful lot of it. I want some friendships too!)
no subject
I honestly know where you're coming from but I can't condemn romantic subplots because of the good ones I like in shows.
I mean, I groan when it becomes obvious that one is going to happen. Mostly because I assume it's going to be bad and normally the characters have nothing in common. So, therefore, it will be taking away from the plot. (The reason I was watching the show in the first place.) However, there are those times when the romantic subplot makes sense. It doesn't subtract from the major plot and, in fact, adds to it instead. It's a part of my whole experience and not just some tacked on gangly thing that the bad ones can be.
So... I think my problem is less that they exist but that a lot of writers assume it must be done to have a good story. Because of this assumption they shove one in whether it should be there or not. Then because of that the writing is normally not of the best quality and really, it's all just one long downhill spiral.
I believe that instead of thinking of romantic subplots as a must in stories we need to change that and start seeing them as a tool to make a better story. But here's the deal, just like a person shouldn't use a screwdriver on a nail, so too should a writer be wondering if a romantic subplot is the tool they should be using for their story. So these writers need to ask themselves: What is my story trying to say? Does my romantic subplot say the same thing? If not, why? If it does, is it this the best way to express what I'm saying? If it isn't, why? If it is, does it seem natural? Does it come out of nowhere? Does it make sense?
And these are only a few questions. There are probably more. Hopefully this will do either one of two things; it will either get rid of a bad romantic subplot or improve it to be an addition to the story, rather than a subtraction.
...Well that's a bit too hopeful but, you know, a girl can dream.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-28 01:59 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 12:40 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 01:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 01:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Also, just because many people ship in fandom doesn't mean that all of them want a lot of romance in canon. A lot of people are perfectly happy to ship non-canon pairings, for example, and many people use fic to explore themes or material that isn't in canon.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 01:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 01:57 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-27 03:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-12-27 07:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
An example of a romance not working was the Startrek reboot. You could literally cut every single the Uhura/Spock romantic scene and have no non-Uhura/Spock scene be impacted by the loss. A romance that did work was in Contagion, because it was there solely to show how the infection impacted normal human behavior, of which romance and the longing for love is one of them. It would change the whole tone of the movie to have it missing.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 02:22 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 02:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Elementary's doing okay on this front so far, but they've still tripped over a few of Joan's exes and Sherlock's prostitutes and casual fuckbuddies anyway. *sigh*
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 03:37 am (UTC)(link)They're entirely different issues, really, so I wouldn't worry about it much.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-27 11:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
That said, romances in particular can cause problems that other subplots don't, necessarily:
1) The dearth of good male/female friendships in media. As someone who's longest-lasting and closest friendships have been with men, this is particularly galling. The need for romance to appeal to certain target audiences destroys even the possibility of friendship, even if that's how it started (and results in all kind of social ills, such as the "friendzone" where in - because of this kind of media - men assume a friendship with a woman entitles them to an eventual romance).
2) The dearth of good, stable, realistic relationships. Because "romance" virtually always means "two characters falling in love" there's a severe lack of characters who are already in relationships, and stay that way (pre-existing relationships tend to exist only to be ripped apart so that the characters in them can fall in love again with someone else). As soon as characters get together, they "live happily ever after" - which is completely untrue and extremely boring. I'm sick to death of always watching the beginning phases of a romance. If someone thinks that nothing exciting ever happens within and existing relationship, certainly nothing worth writing about, then they've never had a good one. I have, and this is shit.
3) The total derailment of good female characters. It doesn't have to happen (see Aeryn, Roslin) but it so often does. As soon as she falls in love with the hero, that's all her character will be about anymore - being his girlfriend. And more likely than not, being the hero's girlfriend means he'll have to save her (even if she was tougher than him beforehand) and she'll mysteriously lose all courage and common sense just so he can accomplish this. Bllleeeeeccccchhhhh.
As a result, OP, I concur. It's part of the reason I skim the synopses of films and books that look like they might be interesting, but might also have a sappy, stereotypical romance in them. It's a dealbreaker, for sure.
And if you haven't already, may I suggest militaria? Avoid "epic" Michael Bay shit because that'll have romance in for sure, but the gritty, realistic kind (Das Boot, The Hurt Locker, Apocalypse Now) almost invariably avoids it. And fuck yeah.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-12-28 03:18 pm (UTC)(link)