case: ([ Zell; Liek omg. ])
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2007-08-25 05:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #232 ]


⌈ Secret Post #232 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

20.

21.



Notes:

... guys, writing "this is not a secret" on your uh, secrets is probably not a good idea, you know?

Have some more random bite links! Devilbats. ♥

Secrets Left to Post: 07 pages, 169 secrets from Secret Submission Post #034.
Secrets Not Posted: 0 broken links, [ 1 2 3 4 5 ] not!secrets, 0 not!fandom, [ 1 ] repeat, [ 1 ] too big.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Sunday, August 26th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: 2

[identity profile] rmarques.livejournal.com 2007-08-25 10:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Well... I'll go on a limbo here, and say that the secret maker probably means some of the people at [livejournal.com profile] antiyaoi. So, I THINK (and someone feel free to smack if I am wrong), the secret maker only means the people that only ship het, and then go around and bitch about mxm/fxf ships and those that endorse them.

Re: 2

[identity profile] powercorrupts.livejournal.com 2007-08-25 10:10 pm (UTC)(link)
Nothing in their secret made it clear to me that they weren't just bashing on het shippers. "I hate het shippers" is not the way to say you hate homophobic and batshit het shippers. It is, however, the way to piss off everyone who has ever argued in favour of a het ship. The secret started off by grouping people into two overgeneralizations, and ended with stating that the OP was immune to either grouping.

If they'd ranted about a specific incident with batshit het shippers, I'd give them the benefit of the doubt, but as it is, the secret just reads to me like someone with a chip on their shoulder and a superiority complex.

Re: 2

[identity profile] rmarques.livejournal.com 2007-08-25 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey, I agree that the secret wasn't exacly the best worded ever. I'm just trying to think of what the OP may have meant.(Why do I see wank coming?)

Re: 2

[identity profile] powercorrupts.livejournal.com 2007-08-25 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)
Poorly worded overgeneralizations? Declarations of hate? Statements of oppression? Wank? NEVAR! xD (Just add water)

On the positive side, at least it's not wank about secrets about fanart in icons. That was getting old.

I agree that the OP probably didn't mean things the way they said them. But you can't say things like that and not expect to offend or irritate some number of people.

Re: 2

[identity profile] rmarques.livejournal.com 2007-08-25 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
It's like, the perfect recepy for instant wank :3

Or the strikethrough. That one got old the minute it was brought up for the second time.

And I agree.