Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-01 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2191 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2191 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[ 1 2 - not!secrets ]
ns1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:03 am (UTC)(link)Re: ns1
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:32 (UTC) - ExpandN!S 1
N!S 1
No. You're thinking of Slytherin. (Conniving, manipulative, vain...)
Re: N!S 1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)NS 1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:11 am (UTC)(link)N!S 2
NS1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:21 am (UTC)(link)Re: NS1
NS 1
NS1
(& thinking about this, earth IS the most feminine of the elements)
Re: NS1
Re: NS1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 00:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: NS1
Re: NS1
Re: NS1
NS2
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:39 am (UTC)(link)NS1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:44 am (UTC)(link)If you're saying that Hufflepuff gets a bad rap because it is associated with femininity, then no, I think you're wrong.
If you're saying that Hufflepuff's strengths overlap considerably with traits which are traditionally considered feminine, and that these strengths are devalued in many circles, then you have a point, but I'm not sure it's a very relevant one. Hufflepuff is not generally seen as "badass". We knew this already.
Re: NS1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 01:16 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, but it not being generally seen as badass because its strengths overlap with what is traditionally considered feminine is interesting. I think OP has a point.
Re: NS1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:26 (UTC) - Expandns1
Either way, I think you may have a point.
Re: ns1
Re: ns1
Re: ns1
not "good" enough for any of the other houses? no worries, helga'll take ya! no one wants to be "the rest".
Re: ns1
Re: ns1
Re: ns1
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 02:21 am (UTC)(link)This is what I meant. I didn't mean Hufflepuff gets a bad rap because women are gross and stupid, and aren't capable of bravery or whatever the other houses have. I meant it as, considering females are stereotyped as having the same sort of traits or personalities; gentle, soft hearted, giving, avoid competition. Those are all stereotypes put upon women.
None of those traits are bad, BUT, people have grown to view them as weak and useless traits to have in a patriarchal society. They think you are not going to have success if you aren't competitive. They think you are a doormat if you have even the slightest gentleness in your personality. I could go on and on.
It is an interesting point on Western society putting emphasis on Individualism. I think that really does play highly into it as well.
I just didn't want to make a tl;dr secret, but I guess I should have known better when it comes to anything with supposed hate on women.
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
Re: ns1
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:58 (UTC) - Expand2
ns1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 01:01 am (UTC)(link)Re: ns1
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 03:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 04:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
Re: ns1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 01:43 am (UTC)(link)Re: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 03:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ns1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 03:50 (UTC) - ExpandNS1
(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 06:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: NS1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 07:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: NS1
(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 07:52 (UTC) - Expand