case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-01 06:49 pm

[ SECRET POST #2191 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2191 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________








Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

[personal profile] fscom 2013-01-01 11:52 pm (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

[ 1 2 - not!secrets ]

ns1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:03 am (UTC)(link)
fail!troll secret is fail
insanenoodlyguy: (Awesomeface)

Re: ns1

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-01-02 12:20 am (UTC)(link)
This. 2/10. Entirely too obvious. JUST LIKE A DUMB WOMAN TO FUCK IT UP

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:32 (UTC) - Expand
visp: (Default)

N!S 1

[personal profile] visp 2013-01-02 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
I wouldn't say that. I mean, even if the books there's more prominent male Hufflepuff characters than female. Besides, the #1 provider of 2-dimensional female characters is the love interest, and "hardworking sensible person" isn't the most popular stereotype there.
fingalsanteater: (Default)

N!S 1

[personal profile] fingalsanteater 2013-01-02 12:09 am (UTC)(link)
Hahahaha.

No. You're thinking of Slytherin. (Conniving, manipulative, vain...)

Re: N!S 1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:31 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, am I supposed to believe that the house with Draco Malfoy and Blaise Zabini is LESS effeminate than the house with Zacharias Smith and Cedric Diggory? (Shhh about Justin Finch-Fletchley...)

NS 1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:11 am (UTC)(link)
So you're saying women can't be brave or ambitious or smart?
insanenoodlyguy: (Heavy)

N!S 2

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2013-01-02 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
SWEET LORD YES
Edited 2013-01-02 00:21 (UTC)

NS1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
What sort of fuckery is this???
lunabee34: (Default)

Re: NS1

[personal profile] lunabee34 2013-01-02 12:29 am (UTC)(link)
The dumb kind.
morieris: http://iconography.dreamwidth.org/32982.html (Kyoshi - margareydaw_s2)

NS 1

[personal profile] morieris 2013-01-02 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
No.
brooms: (pingu)

NS1

[personal profile] brooms 2013-01-02 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
that's why their common room is near a kitchen

(& thinking about this, earth IS the most feminine of the elements)
bombay: bombay cat (Default)

Re: NS1

[personal profile] bombay 2013-01-02 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Huh. I always felt that air and water were more feminine. I get the whole "mother earth" thing and whatnot, but in and of the elements themselves...

Re: NS1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS1

[personal profile] bombay - 2013-01-02 01:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS1

[personal profile] brooms - 2013-01-02 01:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS1

[personal profile] brooms - 2013-01-02 01:07 (UTC) - Expand

NS2

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
Oh my god that's beautiful.

NS1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure what you're saying here.

If you're saying that Hufflepuff gets a bad rap because it is associated with femininity, then no, I think you're wrong.

If you're saying that Hufflepuff's strengths overlap considerably with traits which are traditionally considered feminine, and that these strengths are devalued in many circles, then you have a point, but I'm not sure it's a very relevant one. Hufflepuff is not generally seen as "badass". We knew this already.

Re: NS1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 01:16 am (UTC)(link)
Hufflepuff is not generally seen as "badass". We knew this already.

Yeah, but it not being generally seen as badass because its strengths overlap with what is traditionally considered feminine is interesting. I think OP has a point.

Re: NS1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:26 (UTC) - Expand
logicbutton: Hawkeye from Fullmetal Alchemist with her hair down (Default)

ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton 2013-01-02 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
I'd also consider the possibility that the relationship is more correlative than causative. Bravery and ambition in particular are associated with individualism (and people with high intelligence stand out as well), while Hufflepuff traits are more useful in a collective setting. I would argue that in modern Western society, individualism is much more highly valued than collectivism, although that itself might be because those two things are also gendered (but is that gendering as old as sexism itself? They both go back to time immemorial, so maybe we can't be sure). What I'm saying is, maybe it's less that the traits are gendered and more that both the traits and the genders are associated with different philosophies, one of which is more valued than the other.

Either way, I think you may have a point.
bombay: bombay cat (Default)

Re: ns1

[personal profile] bombay 2013-01-02 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
This after the secret/discussion about Japan's collectivist culture makes me wonder how different cultures value and perceive the various houses.

Re: ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton - 2013-01-02 01:18 (UTC) - Expand
brooms: (pingu)

Re: ns1

[personal profile] brooms 2013-01-02 01:33 am (UTC)(link)
i always thought the "bad" rep was due to hufflepuff being the charity house, more or less.

not "good" enough for any of the other houses? no worries, helga'll take ya! no one wants to be "the rest".
Edited 2013-01-02 01:34 (UTC)

Re: ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton - 2013-01-02 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

[personal profile] brooms - 2013-01-02 02:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton - 2013-01-02 02:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 02:21 am (UTC)(link)
OP here
This is what I meant. I didn't mean Hufflepuff gets a bad rap because women are gross and stupid, and aren't capable of bravery or whatever the other houses have. I meant it as, considering females are stereotyped as having the same sort of traits or personalities; gentle, soft hearted, giving, avoid competition. Those are all stereotypes put upon women.

None of those traits are bad, BUT, people have grown to view them as weak and useless traits to have in a patriarchal society. They think you are not going to have success if you aren't competitive. They think you are a doormat if you have even the slightest gentleness in your personality. I could go on and on.
It is an interesting point on Western society putting emphasis on Individualism. I think that really does play highly into it as well.

I just didn't want to make a tl;dr secret, but I guess I should have known better when it comes to anything with supposed hate on women.

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton - 2013-01-02 02:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

[personal profile] omorka - 2013-01-02 02:47 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:58 (UTC) - Expand
elaminator: (Skies of Arcadia: Aika & Fina & Vyse)

2

[personal profile] elaminator 2013-01-02 12:54 am (UTC)(link)
Okay, those tattoos are hot. UNF. (Not exactly the reaction you were hoping for I imagine. Sorry...)

ns1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 01:01 am (UTC)(link)
Rep =/= rap

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 01:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton - 2013-01-02 01:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:00 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:24 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 03:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 04:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:02 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 02:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

[personal profile] logicbutton - 2013-01-02 02:13 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, rap would be correct in this instance. Bad rap = someone being known for or associated with something negative that's not their fault or that they haven't done (i.e. they're being "punished" for things they haven't done. Since "rap" was associated with corporal punishment back in the day, getting a bad rap meant being reprimanded for something you haven't done/didn't deserve punishment for). Bad rep = someone having a bad reputation as a direct result of something that they've done or other questionable behaviour.

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 03:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: ns1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 03:50 (UTC) - Expand

NS1

(Anonymous) 2013-01-02 06:27 am (UTC)(link)
INCORRECT USE OF SEMICOLON IS DRIVING ME CRAZY

Re: NS1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 07:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NS1

(Anonymous) - 2013-01-02 07:52 (UTC) - Expand