case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-02 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2192 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2192 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.
[Tales of the Abyss]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Merlin, RPS]


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.
[Lilo & Stitch]


__________________________________________________











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 032 secrets from Secret Submission Post #313.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-03 03:38 am (UTC)(link)
One of the reasons I switched to western fandoms is that even when the characters are supposedly kids, they look like adults (because the actors usually are).

You aren't making any sense. It's bad for adults to look younger, but it's totally okay for kids to look like adults? Give me characters who are legal but look younger any day, I'd rather that than characters who are actually underage but meant to look older. THAT is squicky.
velvet_mace: (Default)

[personal profile] velvet_mace 2013-01-03 03:45 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, no. An adult who looks and acts identically to a 10 year old -- I can't see them as anything but 10. I can't ship them. Not sexy. I'm attracted to grown ups exclusively. A twenty year old who playing a 17 year old doesn't hit the same squick.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-03 04:12 am (UTC)(link)
An adult who looks and acts younger is still an adult. A kid that looks older is still a kid.

Pretty hypocritical to say you dislike the former but are a-ok with the latter.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-03 04:10 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly the same logic when they casted Sue Lyon for Dolores in the first Lolita film. Instead of the logic of "hey, how about let's pick a young looking adult, let's go for an old looking kid to pass the censorship AND make it fappable?"

Needless to say, Lyon was fucked for life and I don't care how uncool this opinion is but the first Lolita film was just goddamn awful.