Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-09 06:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2199 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2199 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[Dragon Age 2]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Baby-sitters Club]
__________________________________________________
08.

[The Twelve Kingdoms]
__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

[Dangan Ronpa]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 023 secrets from Secret Submission Post #314.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Jake the dad (Spoilers)
(Anonymous) 2013-01-10 12:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: Jake the dad (Spoilers)
The other people who start spoiler warned threads on the first thread without clearly labeling them are rude too, two wrongs don't make a right.
Re: Jake the dad (Spoilers)
Re: Jake the dad (Spoilers)
Idk I just think it was rude.
Re: Jake the dad (Spoilers)
(Anonymous) 2013-01-10 01:18 am (UTC)(link)Re: bad form
I'm a fast reader. A lot of bookworms are, frankly. I was seeing the words "Jake" and "Puppies" and such before I registered that it said Spoiler. I automatically went to the text.
If this were further down the page it would've been easier, but it wasn't. They put spoilers right fricking there at the top of the page where it's difficult to miss.
Do I think they're a jerk? No, at least not until they responded all jerky. It just was kinda thoughtless. Thus I'm not whining and just warning them that putting another post ahead of it if they're the first one up might be cool.
Re: bad form
(Anonymous) 2013-01-10 07:46 am (UTC)(link)Sounds like a personal problem, and if it bothers you, maybe you should slow down long enough to comprehend what you're reading.
Re: bad form