fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2201 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2201 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

[Monty Python]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Umineko no Naku Koro Ni]

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

09. [SPOILERS for Arkham City]

__________________________________________________

10. [SPOILERS for Django Unchained]

__________________________________________________

11. [SPOILERS for Evil Dead Remake/Reboot]

__________________________________________________

12. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]

__________________________________________________

[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

13. [WARNING for rape]

[Skyfall]

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #314.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Thank you for this comment. I don't get why so people are quick to jump to "YOU MUST THINK I'M A SLUTTY SLUT MCSKANK-PANTS WHO SLUTS AROUND BECAUSE I'M SO SLUTTY!!!!" and act like casual sex ISN'T an incredibly common thing (that they themselves have possibly advocated for in these very threads "as long as both parties know where they stand.")

And that's true! Casual sex is just fine for consenting adults who are on the same page, but it's not something I can do, because I do not get the sexy feelings for all the super-hot celebrities I see on TV or the cutie barista at my local coffee shop. That's not a fucking judgment on other people.

I jumped there because either outright shaming (mostly the world would be better/happier if more people were like us or comfortable being "out" as demi) or condesenscion about being enlightened or more mature has Bern the tone of every person who I've discussed or read about identifying as demisexual.

Obviously I haven't interacted with every person who identifies as demisexual I just don't really get the point of wanting to declare demisexuality?

"Casual sex isn't my thing," doesn't seem like it should need it's own term or even any further explanation really.

... yeah, see, you're undermining your own point by assuming that non-"demisexuals" would just fuck someone because they find them physically attractive without having a conversation or some sort of connection first.

Again, not that there's anything wrong with that -- rock on if you want to fuck someone you literally have no connection to -- and I don't know about the rest of the "fullsexuals", but I am fully capable of being incapable of boning someone who is attractive to me physically but repulses me in a personal manner.

You've acknowledged that you can experience aesthetic attraction (see: cute barista). It's way more likely you're a standoffish personality when it comes to romantic situations than you're a whole other subset, sorry to say. I'm not shaming you for that. Do what you want. Just don't act like a special snowflake for it.

It just reeks of "I really CONNECT with people before I fuck them, unlike you." Probably bad PR. But there nevertheless. Blame Tumblr. I always do.

yeah, see, you're undermining your own point by assuming that non-"demisexuals" would just fuck someone because they find them physically attractive without having a conversation or some sort of connection first.

Um, no? Where are you getting that? Because at no point did I say people who aren't demisexual will fuck anyone just because they're hot. I am referring to those feelings of WANTING to sex up a hot actor or character because they're hot ("Unf! Yummy! I want to have his babies! I am ready! I want to fuck him!") which is a feeling that I, personally, have never in my life felt for anybody that I was not personally very close to (and identifying with a character or a perceived persona isn't the same to me), regardless of how attractive I could see that they were.

You've acknowledged that you can experience aesthetic attraction (see: cute barista). It's way more likely you're a standoffish personality when it comes to romantic situations than you're a whole other subset, sorry to say.
What? I mean, what? How do you go from "you're someone who can recognize aesthetically pleasing things" to "you're just standoffish"? Because that's fucking stupid. Because, much like I can recognize that the shirt my sister puts on is a very nice shirt that looks lovely on her or that many of dresses that get trotted out on red carpets are beautiful, while never ever in a million years wanting to put that garment on my body, I can appreciate the attractiveness of individuals.

It just reeks of "I really CONNECT with people before I fuck them, unlike you."
No, I'm pretty sure that's you wanting to feel like somebody is unfairly judging other people so you can be all righteous about it.But the only one doing the judging here is you and others like you.

Casual sex isn't an incredibly common thing. It's much rarer than long-term serial monogamy. Researchers sometimes ask people what they think an ideal number of sexual partners over the course of their lifetime would be, and the most common answer for both men and women is one.

[ SECRET POST #2201 ]

Re: Non-fandom secrets

Re: Non-fandom secrets

Re: Non-fandom secrets

Re: Non-fandom secrets

Re: Non-fandom secrets