Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-19 03:12 pm
[ SECRET POST #2209 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2208 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 06 pages, 121 secrets from Secret Submission Post #316.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Dangan Ronpa's really good with female characters in general, IMO.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-19 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)Here you go. :)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-19 09:35 pm (UTC)(link)http://i.imgur.com/ZS4XYTm.png
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-19 11:22 pm (UTC)(link)Most of the ones I see at a glance are guys, but you may find something.
no subject
I pretty much have to "settle" for digging through artist's galleries and webcomics, but hey whatever.
via
also check out
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-19 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)A female character is skinny? She's "conventionally slender". The artist fails.
A female character is buxom? She's "conventionally curvy/hourglass". The artist fails.
The character is noticeably heavy/overweight? She's not really fat; she's only "Hollywood fat". Fail.
She's muscular? She's only sneering scare quotes "muscular" because she carries the muscle evenly and still has a female shape, with less prominent pectorals and abs. You know, like an actual muscular woman. Still, THE ARTIST FAILS.
I think the reason you don't see female characters depicted like the person in your secret is because, unless they're bodybuilding or taking testosterone, most female bodies just won't carry muscle that way. That sort of build automatically parses as "male". It would be like giving a woman a beard. I mean, it's technically possible for it to happen, but why would you do that? Beard representation? Unless the artist's intent is specifically to subvert gender norms, it just doesn't make sense.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-20 12:00 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-20 12:25 am (UTC)(link)Often they're not "sexy fat" or "sexy thin", but get criticized as "conventional" unless they're far from statistical norms (shapes you are actually unlikely to see on a person). If a character is [x], they're not [x] enough.
I'm not sure what you're referring to when you say "stock figures", because what I listed were broad categories, and thousands of shapes fall under each one. And human bodies actually do all fall within certain bounds (there are physical impossibilities). It seems to me that they need to be depicted on the very edges of those bounds in order to be accepted and not considered "convention". It makes more sense to me to create characters who look like someone you might actually see every day on the street.
no subject
You also missed one important category of women that do not fall under any of the ones you listed, yet also encompasses an enormous number of women: the ones who do not, in fact, have a standard female shape. You mention buxom, but there are not a large number of pear-shaped women whose hips are disproportionately larger than their breasts in the media -- save Kimmy K and JLo, anyway, who are 'freaks' in Hollywood. There are certainly very few apple-shaped women. There are extremely few muscular woman, with or without the "shape."
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-22 02:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-20 07:49 am (UTC)(link)The ideal of a fit woman whose musculature is all-but-invisible is not the natural limit of what a woman can build. Take Serena Williams, or Gina Carano (when she was still fighting), or Jessica Biel in Blade III. Visibly powerful, with serious guns. There are a handful of women drawn this way - I try to collect pictures of them - but it's extremely uncommon. So, no, women can be drawn with lots of different body types stereotyped as "masculine" (such as being a long lean beanpole, or being a round and plump with a large belly, or whatever), and still parse as female. Most artists just depict them as the same uniform "slender with distinctive curves and long legs", which is not the only look women possess. It can be dismaying if you like women with the kind of builds that aren't popular, which I also do.
It would be like giving a woman a beard. I mean, it's technically possible for it to happen, but why would you do that? Beard representation?
No, because beards are sexy to some people, and if you find women and beards sexy, maybe you want to combine your favorite sexy things into one sexy whole. Maybe you find facial hair incompatible with women, but not everyone does.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-20 12:29 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Really, all the female characters from Dangan Ronpa are great.
no subject
I love Dangan Ronpa, they have so many great female characters, designs and all.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-01-21 01:10 am (UTC)(link)no subject