case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-26 03:17 pm

[ SECRET POST #2216 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2216 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-01-26 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think she feels that way either. Considering when the final books were published, it makes sense that she would be more aware of the negativity a gay character would bring her than the potential positive impact it would have on queer people. She wrote the last two books during the middle of the 00s; even so short a time before, the climate was not the same as right now. From an authorial pov, she probably came up with the idea of Dumbledore being gay as a natural progression of his character, but as an author she chose not to include it because she didn't think it was relevant information AND/OR, once again, only knew the negative consequences of having a gay character, but it still meant enough to her to mention it when a relevant question was asked.

She was never really a queer ally; she wrote a character. People are condemning her as if she had proclaimed herself as an ally all along when she never did.