Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-26 03:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #2216 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2216 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 120 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - personal attack ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Activist Communities
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 04:31 am (UTC)(link)That said, my problem with most online 'activist' communities is that *everything* is black or white, and if anyone has a different point of view, then they're automatically in the wrong. I've seen way too much dog piling and attacking happen because someone said something just different enough that it wasn't ~perfectly~ the same to have much, if any, faith in them.
Plus, and this is a pet peeve, it gets to me a little the fuck out of me that they'll have a very big 'Who gives a fuck' reaction when it comes to the homeless, because it isn't a ~ glamorous~ issue.
Re: Activist Communities
(Anonymous) 2013-01-27 05:24 pm (UTC)(link)Relevant tidbit reblogged by Maymay (http://days.maybemaimed.com/post/33028244161/one-of-the-purposes-of-discourse-is-to-normalize) "— Rebecca Crane (@wanderingpirate) October 5, 2012
“Pop social justice,” as I’ve come to call it, concerns itself primarily with the establishment of a particular party line and the mustering of social capital among adherents to defend that worldview, offering powerful human resources in exchange for compassionate freethought.
For people consumed by The Abstracted Persona of the Anti-Ism Community At Large (TAPAICAL) (http://alicorn24.livejournal.com/44922.html), “truth” and “justice” are not outcomes, methodologies, or principles. Rather, they are rhetorical swords with which to cut out dissent. For such people, “social change” is functionally synonymous with fascism or thoughtcrime."
I couldn't have put it better myself.