case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-30 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2220 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2220 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Sherlock, The Hobbit, Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Hotel Transylvania]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Skyfall]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Love Actually]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Small Wonder]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Downton Abbey]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Magi]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
making_excuses: (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] making_excuses 2013-01-31 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
Not exactly helping your argument here OP...
Edited (I am tired, and I can't find the right word... I tried. ) 2013-01-31 01:36 (UTC)

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-01-31 08:34 am (UTC)(link)
Are... you actually saying it's not unhealthily obsessive just because it wasn't considered as such in Victorian times? Because the 'something abusive is totes OK because old' argument is frequently soundly shot down on this comm.
making_excuses: (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] making_excuses 2013-01-31 09:38 am (UTC)(link)
My problem is with the people who gush over it like it's adorable while looking at it with modern eyes.

Was the part I was replying to, and it is slightly condescending to say that the people reading ACD (or classic literature in general) don't see the difference between how they acted/wrote/behaved then and how life is today and maybe possibly take that into account when reading something.

Re: OP

(Anonymous) 2013-01-31 10:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Again, then I'm not talking about you.

I don't mean every who likes it are idiots, I meant I'm disturbed by people who don't take the historical context into account and think it's a perfectly healthy relationship everyone should strive to have.