[ SECRET POST #2220 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2220 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Sherlock, The Hobbit, Doctor Who]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Hotel Transylvania]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Skyfall]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Love Actually]


__________________________________________________



09.
[The Walking Dead]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Small Wonder]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Star Trek: Deep Space Nine]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Downton Abbey]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Magi]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Homestuck]


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[tweedisgood]

No, that's not what they critcise it for. At all.

[(Anonymous)]

Literally the only criticism I have ever seen for Twilight (apart from the bad writing) is that Edward and Bella's relationship is overly obsessive. What do you think people criticise Twilight for?

[tweedisgood]

Not "overly obesessive" - abusive. Because it is.

My point was that they do not criticise something that is "the exact same thing" as Holmes/Watson. There is no comparison with Holmes and Watson to be made and people who think there is are wholly missing several crucial issues and wilfully misrepresenting others in an effort to defend the indefensible.

Those of us who tackle the Holmes and Watson canon relationship in my experience nearly always do so with a recognition that Holmes is not an idealised love/friendship object - and the love/friendship Watson has for him is complex. But he is not an Edward Cullen, and anyone who thinks so is simply ignorant.

[(Anonymous)]

Well at least you understand that.

Again, my point was directed at the SOME people who DO think it is idealised.

Of course he's not as bad as Edward Cullen. He's not a 100 year vampire stalker. But he is often a jerk to Watson. And while Watson is obviously nowhere near the doormat that is Bella Swan, he is still remarkably permissive of some of Holmes' douchey behaviour.