case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-01-31 07:36 pm

[ SECRET POST #2221 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2221 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.


__________________________________________________



20.


__________________________________________________










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-01 01:57 am (UTC)(link)
Well-fitted suits, waistcoats, ties, etc. on men. (And women.)
Also, when people wear dress shirts + waistcoats with the sleeves rolled up to their elbows.

Bonus points for suspenders. Or nicely polished shoes.
elaminator: (Inception: Cobb/Arthur)

Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?

[personal profile] elaminator 2013-02-01 02:33 am (UTC)(link)
This is probably fairly common but I 100% agree.

Not much hotter than a well dressed man or woman.

Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?

(Anonymous) 2013-02-01 03:27 am (UTC)(link)
I was literally going to say "Arthur from Inception much?" on this one and there you are with that icon. XD
elaminator: (Avengers cast: RDJ)

Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?

[personal profile] elaminator 2013-02-01 03:46 am (UTC)(link)
I couldn't resist!
agentcthulhu: knitted yellow-green cthulhu in black suit and sunglasses (Default)

Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?

[personal profile] agentcthulhu 2013-02-01 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
waistcoats

Yes! Like this guy: