Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-01-31 07:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #2221 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2221 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #317.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?
(Anonymous) 2013-02-01 01:57 am (UTC)(link)Also, when people wear dress shirts + waistcoats with the sleeves rolled up to their elbows.
Bonus points for suspenders. Or nicely polished shoes.
Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?
Not much hotter than a well dressed man or woman.
Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?
(Anonymous) 2013-02-01 03:27 am (UTC)(link)Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?
Re: Not-explicitly-sexual kinks?
Yes! Like this guy: