[ SECRET POST #2230 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2230 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Early because blizzard, not quite sure if power will last.

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 103 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Stupid question about spoilers

[biohazardgirl]

I am always unsure too. But I would say two weeks for an episode of a tv show, three weeks for a movie, and four to five weeks for a book, depending on the length.

But honestly I'm still very careful and get hung up on spoilers. I still sometimes worry about spoiling things as old as the fifth Harry Potter book which, uh, came out over ten years ago.

Re: Stupid question about spoilers

[dreemyweird]

I would say that, while TV shows and movies do have something of a standard spoiler period, with books the matter becomes more complicated. When a book is very obscure, bits of the plot can be spoilery many years after the actual release. It does not apply to 19th and early 20th century books that much, but I think that it is fair to warn for spoilers when we have obscure works published ten-fifteen years ago.
And I do approve of tvtropes' policy of hiding ALL the spoilery things regardless of their age.

Which is bizarre, considering the fact that I always seek for spoilers on purpose.

Re: Stupid question about spoilers

[biohazardgirl]

I really like the way tvtropes hides spoilers also.

I like little spoilers but not major ones. So, like, I really like seeking out promotional material for Community to see what's going on all up in that but if I had to see the episode the next day instead of on the day it aired and everyone spoiled the whole thing I would be pretty pissed.

I ended up not watching Legend of Korra because people kept not marking their spoilers on here and I didn't feel like finishing it because it sounded like it sucked :P

Re: Stupid question about spoilers

[(Anonymous)]

...It kind of did suck, and I'm saying that as a fan.