[ SECRET POST #2231 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2231 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 086 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[visp]

Lol no. Your sister's husband, your abusive ex, the previous one-night-stand that you're pretty sure stole some of your jewelry on the way out, your boss, your direct subordinate, your teenage student... the list is endless.

[(Anonymous)]

Not all of those are bad. Is the person consenting? Is there no cheating involved? Congrats, you can have sex with them!

[(Anonymous)]

you'd ASSUME that your sister wouldn't want you to sleep with her husband. or that you'd be smarter than to sleep with your underage student but apparently calling people out for breaking someone's trust and then the law is slut-shaming.

[(Anonymous)]

^This

Sometimes I think SJWs are getting carried away with this "____"-shaming stuff. I agree with things like calling girls "sluts" for having more sex than you do, (or more partners and ASSUMING that they're having sex) or fat shaming (because some people overeat to deal with feelings so shaming them makes them feel worse, and yanno, human decency)

But calling out people for doing things that are wrong, like sleeping with a teenage student is not "waaaah stop shaming" it's something that is fucking illegal. If it were a male creeping on a female student you'd better believe that they'd be up in arms about it. But apparently if it's a woman creeping on a teenage male student "stop shaming her she's a sexually liberated woman" apparently.

(except if a woman is having sex with a teenager that's not sexually liberated that's being a kind of rapist)

SA IMPORTANT NOTE

[(Anonymous)]

I agree that things like calling girls "sluts" for having more sex than you do, (or more partners and ASSUMING that they're having sex) or fat shaming (because some people overeat to deal with feelings so shaming them makes them feel worse, and yanno, human decency) are wrong.

sorry, got carried away in my own sentence.

[visp]

"Can?" Sure. Doesn't mean it won't be a stupid decision that'll cause you grief in the long run.

[(Anonymous)]

So...none of those Visp listed were bad?

Your sister's husband = cheating

Your teenage student = non-consent

[(Anonymous)]

You think it's all right to have sex with your teenaged student?

You're not making your case very well.

[inkmage]

Aren't underage people and people on the lower end of a power imbalance pretty much recognized as not being able to fully consent? (I mean in magical fairy-tale land where everyone is consent-aware and SSC regardless of how vanilla they are, etc.)

I'm not really trying to cover for AYRT, since it sounds like they didn't read Visp's list and just spat out a ready response, but still, their guidelines were a) consent and b) no cheating, so....