Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-12 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2233 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2233 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 054 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-02-14 02:17 am (UTC)(link)When the lesbian character does it, she's mostly just... naively perplexed and uncomfortable? WTF
And slightly receptive to it, like she's somewhat bi-curious, but hasn't let herself think about it, even know about her father's sexcapades. At worst (imo) it comes off like the author's trying to clear Alexia's not bigoted or even necessarily close-minded but omg she's totally straight don't forget!! Kinda like her weight, that sparked this thread: lots of little words dropped in to make you think she might be anything other than an Amazonian centerfold, but none of it goes anywhere on closer inspection.
...there's a lot of nuance that these books could use, I think. But I don't think the books even take themselves seriously since the tone seems to be predominantly Victorian-novel/Regency-comedy-of-manners satire, so that's not so bad either.
Re: ayrt
(Anonymous) 2013-02-14 08:39 am (UTC)(link)That might've passed as edgy fifteen or twenty years ago, but these days I think we should expect more than a few well-worn stereotypes.