Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-16 04:17 pm
[ SECRET POST #2237 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2237 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 113 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-16 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)All the examples in the secret are academic crit from the past 50 years or so. Their intros are either going to be written by the author, or by an eminent scholar in the field. It's not about whether they like the book or not - the introduction will lay out the critical relevance of the work and it's current cultural context. OP's problem is that cultural context changes and the field moves on, but reprints don't reflect this. "Liking" the book hasn't much to do with anything.
no subject
Just cause I got a name and your a scaredy coward anon that doesn't stand behind what you say, that's not my problem.