[ SECRET POST #2237 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2237 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 113 secrets from Secret Submission Post #319.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

AYRT

Ahhh, okay. The wording of the original secret suggested to me that it's more of the *historical* inaccuracies OP wanted acknowledged, and that's something I still think just needs a little research.

But framed this way, the desire for an introduction makes a lot more sense. Perhaps something that points out the actively harmful positions a text takes? The bits that shouldn't be condoned, anyway - while leaving the rest to be argued about ad infinitum, as most of us who read criticism are apt to do... =P