[ SECRET POST #2240 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2240 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - trolls that were a little too obvious; come on, at least don't capitalize the same word in every secret. The others can slide by!].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[likeadeuce]

Oh, my God, you all failed basic logic, didn't you.

I am not saying NO ONE IS EVER LIKE THAT.

I am saying THAT IS NOT THE SITUATION THAT OP IS DESCRIBING.

[(Anonymous)]

How do you know that that isn't the situation that OP is describing?

[likeadeuce]

Because there are no words to that effect in what OP wrote?

I mean, yes, that could be what's going on behind the scenes there, but NONE OF THE WORDS IN THAT SECRET are 'my friends are self-diagnosing drama queens who make up their own problems to get attention.' The element of faking was brought in by other commenters.

Sometimes it is depressing to bring basic reading comprehension skills to a thread where no one else seems to bother.

[(Anonymous)]

There are no words to support either conclusion.

Sometimes it's depressing to have to tell another person that she is drawing conclusions based on her own biases while she is simultaneously whining about people drawing conclusions based on their own biases.

[likeadeuce]

Well my conclusion was 'You don't know whether they have real problems or not." So I actually agree with you. The people saying "These are probably a bunch of fakers who can't possibly have actual diagnoses" are not agreeing with you.

[(Anonymous)]

actually, you're just a cunt.

there.

I know I feel better already.

[(Anonymous)]

Not that you did bring them, but I take your word for it.

[(Anonymous)]

By the way, basic fucking logic in the way that you're using it would decree that YOU ARE NO MORE CORRECT THAN ANYONE ELSE HERE. Unless the OP comments to clear shit up, then no one here can know whether OP's fandom friends are either fakers or people with actual problems. INCLUDING YOU.

You want to believe that they have actual problems. But, fact is, the situation OP is describing could involve a bunch of attention-seeking fuckers just as easily as it could involve a bunch of people with actual problems who are, unfortunately, discussing said problems with a frequency that is too great for some others to handle.

YOU ARE ALSO FAILING AT LOGIC YOU JACKASS.

[likeadeuce]

I am saying "don't assume things that are not said are part of the original poster's scenario." You are saying "But why can't we assume things that are not said are part of the original poster's scenario."

We both agree that some things are unknowable. I am saying "It makes sense to stick to the things that were actually stated by OP and not create assumptions based on other scenarios."

This is not the same logic. It is entirely different logic.

[(Anonymous)]

You are saying "But why can't we assume things that are not said are part of the original poster's scenario."

Really? I am? Please point out where I said that.

[likeadeuce]

Sorry, I have no idea if it was actually "you' since you are anon.

"The group of posters who I was originally responding to" then. The ones wanting to insert "they could be fakers" into the scenario. They could also be Nazi cannibals, I guess, since we haven't proved they aren't.

[(Anonymous)]

YES. THEY COULD IN FACT BE NAZI CANNIBALS.

I NEEDED TO GET YOU HERE SO THAT YOU COULD ACCEPT THE SACRIFICIAL UNICORNS AND PARTAKE OF THEIR SACRED SPARKLY BLOOD.

NOW, YOU ARE READY! DRINK AND ABSORB THE POWER!