Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-02-19 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2240 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2240 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 4 - trolls that were a little too obvious; come on, at least don't capitalize the same word in every secret. The others can slide by!].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:52 am (UTC)(link)You want to believe that they have actual problems. But, fact is, the situation OP is describing could involve a bunch of attention-seeking fuckers just as easily as it could involve a bunch of people with actual problems who are, unfortunately, discussing said problems with a frequency that is too great for some others to handle.
YOU ARE ALSO FAILING AT LOGIC YOU JACKASS.
no subject
We both agree that some things are unknowable. I am saying "It makes sense to stick to the things that were actually stated by OP and not create assumptions based on other scenarios."
This is not the same logic. It is entirely different logic.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 02:57 am (UTC)(link)Really? I am? Please point out where I said that.
no subject
"The group of posters who I was originally responding to" then. The ones wanting to insert "they could be fakers" into the scenario. They could also be Nazi cannibals, I guess, since we haven't proved they aren't.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-02-20 03:04 am (UTC)(link)I NEEDED TO GET YOU HERE SO THAT YOU COULD ACCEPT THE SACRIFICIAL UNICORNS AND PARTAKE OF THEIR SACRED SPARKLY BLOOD.
NOW, YOU ARE READY! DRINK AND ABSORB THE POWER!