case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-02-20 06:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2241 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. removed!


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (minorly sexual, illustrated) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
partialsatyr: (Default)

[personal profile] partialsatyr 2013-02-21 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
all i can think to comment on is just how tiny this secret is
damn its tiny. why is it so tiny.
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-02-21 12:36 am (UTC)(link)
It wants to murder your eyes.
partialsatyr: (Default)

[personal profile] partialsatyr 2013-02-21 12:41 am (UTC)(link)
well that's just straight up disrespectful
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-02-21 12:44 am (UTC)(link)
True, but it was that or have not as many people notice it. Since they were already on a wank-baiting roll, what's one more casualty?
othellia: (Default)

[personal profile] othellia 2013-02-21 02:12 am (UTC)(link)
I skip over tiny secrets and only come back to them if the number of comments are decent, so... that may or may not be the best attention grabbing strategy.
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-02-21 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
Eh, this is kind of like the argument with the illegible secrets. Some people think it attracts more people, others don't. I think it may work at first, but once there's a huge influx of secrets like it people will grow bored and stop caring about what was once an interesting outlier. Also, I think even when it works at first a lot of the comments aren't going to be about the secret but rather the aspect that made them bother to try to read it in the first place.