[ SECRET POST #2241 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2241 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08. removed!


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 042 secrets from Secret Submission Post #320.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 (minorly sexual, illustrated) - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[fauxkaren]

Well, I think that's what the filmmakers are trying to sell us about ZDT now that it's gotten criticism. But like no one inside the film even questions it. At first Maya seems a bit disturbed, but she pretty quickly settles into the "well, it's necessary so..." kind of thinking. And then when they can't torture anymore, they lament that fact. Also the film does show that torture led to the vital information that got Bin Laden (which may be true? Idk. I think the US government claims otherwise, but I'm not sure what the truth is.). I just felt like there was no real opposing view.

I think that people who think that the movie is criticizing jingoism are seeing what they want to see in the movie because I don't think there is anything in the movie itself that challenges it.

I do think that Argo could have done a better job of showing the Iranian side, but they got a "you tried" star at least because in the opening of the movie they show how the US intervention in the 50s fucked over Iran and created the current political situation. And you got one of the CIA guys who clearly thought it was stupid that the US was sheltering the shah. And you got the housekeeper at the Canadian ambassador's house who was a somewhat fleshed out character (and we even got to check up on her and see she got out of Iran) to try to paint a more complex picture of people in Iran.

So Argo tried, at least.

It definitely could have been better. But like, idk. ZDT didn't even try.

[chardmonster]

As a middle eastern person (I'm Arabic, not Persian, but I am sensitive to this sort of thing) I'm not sure how they could have done better without making the movie two hours longer.

This is the first movie I've seen in a long time where it wasn't horrible.

Also I'm not sure how portraying saving a bunch of diplomats from the very real torture and imprisonment of a very real, rather shitty regime as positive is jingoistic. The religious revolution in Iran was not nice.

[(Anonymous)]

Nothing Americans do is ever allowed to be shown as even remotely positive. Ever.

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, please. You had better be being sarcastic. Americans are shown as Heroic Saviours of the Day on a regular basis, and American Values as what benighted natives everywhere really, really want and need.

[insanenoodlyguy]

Be that as it may... The Iranian revolution wasn't very nice.

[dazzledfirestar]

I'd have a lot more to say about the massive historical mistakes in Argo as well. They tried, but if you can't get the history of an event right in the first place, my expectations are not going to be high for any other issues attached.

(I'm referring to the need to recut the movie after its TIFF premiere because they royally fucked it up.)

[(Anonymous)]

What "massive historical mistakes" are you concerned about?

[kamino_neko]

I'm not sure 'royally fucked it up' quite applies to a deliberate change. (I assume you mean the 'but the Canadians didn't really do anything, that's just to keep the true story classified' epilogue.)