Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-03-05 06:44 pm
[ SECRET POST #2254 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2254 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15. http://i.imgur.com/Kvb5F08.png?1
[family guy (?), warning for cartoon rape]
__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #322.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 02:16 am (UTC)(link)fwiw a++ boobs. Sorry about the dumbshit friend boob owner. And no. I lurk too. Because i'm not fooled by the warm comforting glow of my screen into thinking people aren't the scum they are.
Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 03:04 am (UTC)(link)Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 03:17 am (UTC)(link)the last comment I saw was the one with a link to the breasts gallery
I missed whatever went on with the delete-a-ton (I do remember scrolling by a very disturbing picture with a "sorry case" subject line; I don't even remember what it was, it disturbed me so much I erased it from my memories right away :0)
Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 03:45 am (UTC)(link)Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 04:22 am (UTC)(link)Ah, I see! Thanks.
That's... not cool. :/ That does explain why the original comment was so awkwardly phrased. (Like, with zero context!)
Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 03:09 am (UTC)(link)Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 04:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: Online duplicity
(Anonymous) 2013-03-06 04:25 am (UTC)(link)YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT SOMEONE WHO WAS VICTIMISED.
SOMEONE WHOSE PRIVACY WAS VIOLATED AND HAS NO WAY OF EVER ENSURING SHE CAN GET IT BACK. THAT PHOTO CAN NOW LITERALLY HAUNT HER FOR THE REST OF HER LIFE.
YOU ARE NOT MAKING AN EDGY JOKE.
YOU ARE DISPLAYING THE ENTITLEMENT OF AN ABUSER.
FUCK YOU