fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2267 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2267 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

08.

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

__________________________________________________

11.

__________________________________________________

12.

__________________________________________________

13.

__________________________________________________

14.

__________________________________________________

15.

__________________________________________________

16.

__________________________________________________

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 072 secrets from Secret Submission Post #324.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

"The ONLY reason sex with animals is wrong is lack of informed consent"

UGH.

What are the other reasons tho?

Are you an idiot, or are you just trying to troll?

I dunno. Which are you?

Seriously if you want to rant about something actually rant about it, don't just quote something out of context and say "UGH". We can't read your mind.

Perhaps a bit of an idiot when it comes to morality. Can never figure out these things.

Anyway, I legitimately see no other reasons :/ If somebody asked me about it, I would've probably said that my only reason is that it feels wrong and completely repulses me.

And this way AYRT

Do you not have an answer?

I'm curious too tho.

animals carry bacteria humans don't

you could get sick with some really weird stuff

DA

Playing devil's advocate: technically, that's a reason that it's "dangerous," not "wrong." Those are different things.

What is your point?

At least they understand the concept of "informed consent."

Some people can't even understand getting that from other humans.

What's wrong with that?
If animals could consent and both the animal and the human were willing...

If that were the case, the only other thing I can think of is physical injury in the case of larger animals.

Unless the OP is thinking of it is as race-mixing? For shame.

Or really tiny ones!
Imagine trying to fuck a hamster

(lol, one doesn't type that everyday)

I've heard birds die if you shove stuff up their butt (cloaca, but whatever.) :/

Well, this thread escalated quickly.

So I guess this means I shouldn't write slash for Hatoful Boyfriend?

It just means you need to go the And Tango Makes Three route.

or a rat

if it gets inside you it will EAT ITS WAY OUT

ha ha, what?

is- is that true? D:

oh god what am i reading this thread

Rats can eat through concrete, so chances are if a rat felt trapped inside you it would work on not being trapped fast.

Wasn't there some movie with a scene where gangsters in a club trapped a rat in a bucket against a man's stomach and lit the top of the bucket on fire to panic the rat into chewing through his stomach to get him to talk? Someone please tell me I didn't make this up.

Re: FUCKING FURRIES

(Anonymous) - 2013-03-19 04:27 (UTC) - Expand

anonymouslyyours - 2013-03-19 04:31 (UTC) - Expand

making_excuses - 2013-03-19 20:12 (UTC) - Expand

xi_feng - 2013-03-19 04:28 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-03-19 22:05 (UTC) - Expand

xi_feng - 2013-03-19 22:07 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-03-20 04:00 (UTC) - Expand

xi_feng - 2013-03-20 05:58 (UTC) - Expand

mechanosapience - 2013-03-19 04:35 (UTC) - Expand

darkmanifest - 2013-03-19 04:51 (UTC) - Expand

world_eater - 2013-03-19 09:24 (UTC) - Expand

aubry - 2013-03-19 09:50 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) - 2013-03-19 21:48 (UTC) - Expand

Well, getting down to it behind the kneejerk EW factor, that's my main objection. Animals cannot consent...and it fucks them up

If they could comprehend and speak and show an adult level of full understanding and verbally consented in the correct language each time I would...be...ok with it....I guess...in theory.

but only if the animal understood without a doubt what was happening and not like a parrot taught to say yes with minimum understanding

I'm kinda okay with this thinking actually? I mean, if animals were intelligent and capable of consent, I wouldn't be rushing to fuck them, but I'd not be so quick to condem those who did?

Mind, it's a hypothetical. As it stands in reality Furries should be purged from this earth.