case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-03-24 03:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #2273 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2273 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10. [repeat]


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 117 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2013-03-24 08:57 pm (UTC)(link)
It was a nice idea that simply couldn't be executed on film in this society. And not because of SJW, but because to do so is to ignore the erasure of people of color on film. Should have remained a book, where this kind of erasure can only happen in people's minds.

None of the artistic merit would have been lost by using the actual races and connecting them with a birthmark, but some exposure for actors and actresses of color would have been gained. Ironically, it's exactly the kind of movie people accuse SJW of doing. Talking the talk, but not walking the walk, i.e. arguing aggressively for equality on the internet or on film but not actually trying to change anything in the reality that exists.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
None of the artistic merit would have been lost by using the actual races and connecting them with a birthmark.

*claps*

Big fat YES to this. And this is coming from someone who liked the film.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 06:38 am (UTC)(link)
A big fat No. A big fat watches the entire point fly over your head.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel like this is a different argument than the "yellowface" one the OP alluded to. Is it wrong because making people up as other races is wrong, or is it wrong because it took opportunities away from actors of other races?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
I mostly think the yellowface was wrong because it looked bad as hell. You can't just put stuff on a white guy's eyes and expect him to pass for asian...
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2013-03-24 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)
In this case, I think they go hand-in-hand. Also, I'm not sure of the history of yellowface, like I am with blackface, so I just focused on the aspect I could comment on. OP did mention racebending on its own.
isana: Yang Buhui (yang buhui)

[personal profile] isana 2013-03-25 08:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Both, to me. Asian-American actors are marginalized enough as they are, and I feel like they wasted an opportunity by not casting them in this movie.

Much as I wanted to love it (the book is one of my favorites), I came away feeling alienated.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)
You could argue that artistic merit would be lost, but it seems like it would be made up for by removing some really terrible makeup. Because some of that is just awful.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2013-03-24 10:46 pm (UTC)(link)
I am dying at all the make-up issues, but I'm pretty sure in the book, everyone actually looks different, and the birthmarks are the key. So I still say that no artistic merit would be lost; it would be a hard argument to make to me. If race doesn't matter, then why would a reincarnation need to look similar to get the point across?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not familiar with the book, so I'll take your word for it on faithfulness to vision.

It seems like on the one hand, having the same actor should better convey it being the same person. However, having the same actor in terrible makeup is distracting. Having the same actor in adequately non-terrible makeup probably wouldn't be recognizable, thereby eliminating the reason to use the same actor to begin with...

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Yea it's kinda weird to me that they used the same actors over the course of the film. I mean it would have made sense to use different actors, instead of using the same actors, with really bad makeup on.

Ironically, it's exactly the kind of movie people accuse SJW of doing. Talking the talk, but not walking the walk, i.e. arguing aggressively for equality on the internet or on film but not actually trying to change anything in the reality that exists.

Yea in a weird way it's almost a perfect mirror of that ideology.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)
Should have remained a book, where this kind of erasure can only happen in people's minds.

So reincarnation can be cultural/racial erasure as well?

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
I suspect they meant readers might imagine the characters as always looking white (or whatever) instead of mentally updating their appearances throughout.
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2013-03-24 10:41 pm (UTC)(link)
This is what I meant. I probably should have stated that more carefully.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
Why the fuck would I imagine people in Korea being white? I imagine them being Korean.
scherrymouse: Uzumaki Kushina (Default)

[personal profile] scherrymouse 2013-03-24 11:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Why the fuck would I imagine people in Korea being white? I imagine them being Korean.

Exactly. o.O

Sometimes I overlook character descriptions if they are brief (e.g. imagining a blond character with dark hair), but the book makes it pretty obvious that not all the characters are white? I never got the impression they all were, anyway.

(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
Same here. I image the characters as they are described.

What kind of people would image an entire books cast as white, o_O

(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 03:19 am (UTC)(link)
People who are themselves more racist than the people they bitch about, and cover it up with a lot of noise making? I dunno. :P
meadowphoenix: (Default)

[personal profile] meadowphoenix 2013-03-25 08:18 pm (UTC)(link)
You missed the hunger games movie controversy over Rue, didn't you?
isana: the little mermaid turning into foam (little mermaid)

[personal profile] isana 2013-03-25 08:28 pm (UTC)(link)
Apparently the same people who did the casting in 'Warm Bodies.'

(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 08:21 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly.
rmg: (Default)

[personal profile] rmg 2013-03-25 07:41 pm (UTC)(link)
None of the artistic merit would have been lost by using the actual races and connecting them with a birthmark

like, you know, they did in the book
isana: Ady An! (ady an)

[personal profile] isana 2013-03-25 08:15 pm (UTC)(link)
This. ^^^
isana: Stocking with sword (badass)

[personal profile] isana 2013-03-25 08:07 pm (UTC)(link)
THANK YOU.