Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-03-24 03:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2273 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2273 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 117 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
None of the artistic merit would have been lost by using the actual races and connecting them with a birthmark, but some exposure for actors and actresses of color would have been gained. Ironically, it's exactly the kind of movie people accuse SJW of doing. Talking the talk, but not walking the walk, i.e. arguing aggressively for equality on the internet or on film but not actually trying to change anything in the reality that exists.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)*claps*
Big fat YES to this. And this is coming from someone who liked the film.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 06:38 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:25 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
Much as I wanted to love it (the book is one of my favorites), I came away feeling alienated.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 03:20 am (UTC)(link)It seems like on the one hand, having the same actor should better convey it being the same person. However, having the same actor in terrible makeup is distracting. Having the same actor in adequately non-terrible makeup probably wouldn't be recognizable, thereby eliminating the reason to use the same actor to begin with...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)Ironically, it's exactly the kind of movie people accuse SJW of doing. Talking the talk, but not walking the walk, i.e. arguing aggressively for equality on the internet or on film but not actually trying to change anything in the reality that exists.
Yea in a weird way it's almost a perfect mirror of that ideology.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:54 pm (UTC)(link)So reincarnation can be cultural/racial erasure as well?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Exactly. o.O
Sometimes I overlook character descriptions if they are brief (e.g. imagining a blond character with dark hair), but the book makes it pretty obvious that not all the characters are white? I never got the impression they all were, anyway.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 12:01 am (UTC)(link)What kind of people would image an entire books cast as white, o_O
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 03:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 08:21 am (UTC)(link)no subject
like, you know, they did in the book
no subject
no subject