Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-03-24 03:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2273 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2273 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 117 secrets from Secret Submission Post #325.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ], [ 1 2 3 - trolls ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 07:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 08:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 07:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 08:11 pm (UTC)(link)(They finally set a DVD release date~)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)It's okay to like something that's problematic as long as you realize it's problematic. Blaming SJW's for pointing this out just makes you look like a huge stan who's sticking their fingers in their ears and trying to ignore what's wrong with the movie.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 22:01 (UTC) - ExpandDA
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 22:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 22:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 01:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 05:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 18:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 06:35 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
They should have used her mom as a reference. Same nose. Same cheekbones. Same chin. Almost same everything.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 08:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(and I totally agree.)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 01:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 08:39 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 06:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
None of the artistic merit would have been lost by using the actual races and connecting them with a birthmark, but some exposure for actors and actresses of color would have been gained. Ironically, it's exactly the kind of movie people accuse SJW of doing. Talking the talk, but not walking the walk, i.e. arguing aggressively for equality on the internet or on film but not actually trying to change anything in the reality that exists.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 21:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 06:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 21:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 21:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 21:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 03:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 21:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 21:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 22:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-24 23:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 00:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 03:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 08:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:00 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)There are limits to what you can do with conventional makeup and studio lights.
Even if it was animation,(which would have been cool as well), then it would have voided this whole SJ storm.
With a movie like that I'm amazed they took the rout they did, it's best to take the safer path.
...and CGI movies are cool.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 01:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 09:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-24 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)This movie isn't perfect, not by a long shot. I still loved it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 12:32 am (UTC)(link)Not that roles couldn't have been cast again in the different races, but tbh, it's cool to know that it's the "same" person in different roles.
(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
no subject
And, as someone else said, at least it wasn't a cast of white people, though the majority were white and British.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-03-25 08:00 am (UTC)(link)It never went too far - note the conspicuous lack of blackface - and what it did do was glorious. I didn't find it problematic at all (and that's as a non-white person), and the makeup didn't bother me as much as it seemed to bother everyone else.
So yeah, anon, I agree.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-03-25 08:45 (UTC) - Expandno subject