Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-03-31 03:11 pm
[ SECRET POST #2280 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2280 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 080 secrets from Secret Submission Post #326.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-01 06:19 pm (UTC)(link)en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors
"Virtual child pornography is punished with up to a third of the sanctions for real life child pornography. Virtual images are defined as: images, or part of images, produced and modified with software from actual photos of minors, where the quality makes it so that fake situations are manipulated and appear as realistic. Therefore, lolicon, shotacon, and cartoon pornography in general are not included."
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lolicon#cite_note-71
"In un'intervista, il vicequestore aggiunto Elvira D'Amato del Centro Nazionale per il contrasto alla pedofilia in rete ha dichiarato: «In Italia il cartone animato, così come il fumetto o la riproduzione 3D, non sono contemplati dagli articoli del Codice Penale, che si occupano in questo caso di perseguire i delitti contro la persona, proprio perché i soggetti raffigurati non sono persone reali. Viceversa [...] un fotomontaggio che raffigurasse un minore, nonostante non ritragga una situazione verificatasi nella realtà, sarebbe incriminabile. [...] La legge non può punire l'intenzione di reato. Per quanto il contenuto di un fumetto sia di carattere palesemente pedopornografico, non è perseguibile penalmente al pari di un fumetto che raffiguri scene di omicidio o qualsiasi altra forma di violenza.»"
Summary for the italian-impaired: loli and shota are drawings and not real people, therefore they're treated the same way other fictional depictions such as those of murder and violence are - i.e. they're not indictable by law. And you know what? Putting my own feelings on loli and shota aside, I think it's a goddamn good law because separating fiction from reality is what sensible people do. It's a slippery slope otherwise and the people from other countries here have shown that.