[ SECRET POST #2290 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2289 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Dangan Ronpa]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Berserk]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Thomas Was Alone]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Paranatural]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Supernatural]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Christoph Waltz]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Lost In Austen]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Les Miserables]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Harry Potter]


__________________________________________________



11.
[Amanda Palmer]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Bioshock Infinite]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Red Riding Hood]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Girls Next Door]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Arthur]


__________________________________________________



16.
[Roosterteeth]


__________________________________________________


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 038 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[childings.livejournal.com]

I know people will come down on you for slut shaming but yeah, maybe I'm just old-fashioned but I don't think visible underwear is appropriate on either sex. I mean, maybe a tiny flash of a bra under a top or something but something like this photo is just ridiculous

It's usually just people showing off how IN SHAPE AND AMAZING THEIR BODIES ARE which is why it's obnoxious

[(Anonymous)]

How do you feel about bikinis?

[childings.livejournal.com]

People don't typically wear them to awards shows, the whole point of a bikini is to wear it at the beach so you can tan or swim in it

[(Anonymous)]

So your only issue is that she wore this to an awards show?

[childings.livejournal.com]

Right, it's about what's appropriate to wear where. I don't get why this is such a difficult concept for people

[kittenmommy]

Some people think they're entitled to do whatever they want whenever they want. Deeming something inappropriate is just another way to shame others and police their behavior! Or something, IDEK.

[sugar_spun]

That's a pretty big reason. If you're walking down the red carpet, you're doing it to show off your outfit to total strangers. To have presence amongst them. Essentially you are there for OTHER PEOPLE. And if you want to flash everyone because you are so ~free~? Oh, maybe it's your right, but you're a pretty rude person. Certainly I'd have no issue if basically every private establishment banned her from the premises, as is their right.

[childings.livejournal.com]

Exactly, like I said, maybe I don't want to see someone else's breasts. Or penis. Same difference

(Now I'm imagining some see-through beaded pants worn by a dude with no underwear)

[visp]

Well, technically no, the "same difference" would be a vagina.

[childings.livejournal.com]

I'm only speaking in terms of shock value, I guess. People think of a woman's breasts as an erogenous zone and a man's bare chest as just a chest. Maybe arousing to some but not as erogenous I suppose

[(Anonymous)]

No, you're there to promote yourself. You are there purely for YOU. It's the only reason anyone goes to events - to be seen. The more shocking, the more people see and talk about you, the better. So this outfit was pretty appropriate and successful.

[childings.livejournal.com]

Are you implying the only way to promote yourself is to walk around practically naked? Whenever I think "awards show outfits" the first thing that pops into my mind is Bjork's swan dress

I mean, walking around with totally visible breasts is just lazy, anyone can think of that

[sugar_spun]

Which is basically the same reason as saying you're there for them.

Because you wouldn't be there if they weren't there first.

And, after all, they'll be there for other people besides you.

You're just there for them.

So this outfit was pretty appropriate and successful.

Oh, I'm sure people talked about her.

But it's still rude and thoughtless behavior.

[visp]

Yes, how dare people take pride in their bodies - especially if they've worked extra hard to look a certain way!

That being said, I fully support a person's right to criticize another person's red carpet choice from a sartorial standpoint. And I think that considering the intricacy of the beading, the visible underwear clashed with the dress's pattern and was distracting. I would have prefered nude-bodysuit underneath if she felt compelled to wear something so transparent.

Of course, I think it'd be awesome if we all could be more naked in public, so I fully support attempts to lower the modesty standards

[childings.livejournal.com]

It's fine to take pride in your body, there is a difference between that and walking out practically naked so nobody has a choice but to look at it (swimwear is different, that was a dumb analogy for anon to make -- I mean, who wants to wear a ton of clothing while they're in the water?) It's like, maybe I don't want to see your breasts. Maybe I don't think they look all that great. Nudist colonies exist for a reason

And yeah, appropriateness of dress aside, this is a pretty gross dress/coverup/whatever it is

[visp]

Well, I like the dress, I just think it'd have gone better with a lining or nude bodysuit.

[childings.livejournal.com]

Possibly, it looks like it was meant to be worn over a slip or something

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed. The beadwork is gorgeous, but the visible underwear spoils the pattern.

[(Anonymous)]

Agreed. Dress is nice, and I personally don't mind the underwear, but the lines of the stockings is what I find really distracting. Could have been done better.

[(Anonymous)]

+1. I think it would've looked great over a slip.

[(Anonymous)]

" It's like, maybe I don't want to see your breasts."

You talk like those people stalk you and dance in front of you all the time. If you don't want to see tits then just look away once you've noticed them. Or do tits literally cause you pain?
Do you also hate looking at male tits? Probably not ;)

[(Anonymous)]

If it were anyone else, I might assume that she wore the dress not knowing how it would react to the intensity of a ton of camera flashes going off/the lighting situation of wherever she was. So, that may actually be what happened.

On the other hand, even if she was aware of how it looked, as much as I really DON'T need to see her boobs and underwear, she's not dressing for me, she's dressing for herself.

[(Anonymous)]

This. I think it looks trashy, period. I don't want to see some guy's boxers hanging out of his pants any more than I want to see a girl's bra straps or whale tail. Keep that under your clothes where it belongs.