Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-11 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2291 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2291 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
But focusing on hot guys is one thing. Writing diatribes about how any female love interest for one of those guys is an 'ugly stupid whore' with ulterior motives is another. Specifically, it's sexism at best and misogyny at worst. This doesn't mean that fandom doesn't have its great points - I actually think that the fact fandom is so self aware of issues like this is one of them, SJW and anti-SJW trolling aside. Instead, it just means that fandom doesn't exist in a vacuum (and couldn't by definition, and shouldn't), and therefore shouldn't be immune to criticism.
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:57 am (UTC)(link)I fully agree. I wasn't referring to those so much as the cases where people are called misogynist for not reading/writing more femslash, or just focusing more on guys (without any associated female-bashing).
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 03:07 am (UTC)(link)what a lovely strawman! <3<3<3
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 04:00 am (UTC)(link)Okay, I suppose I didn't word that properly. 'people' might not have been the right word, more like fandom in general. which *has* been called misogynist for its over-focus on male characters and m/m slash.