Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-04-11 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #2291 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2291 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 020 secrets from Secret Submission Post #327.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)*camps in thread*
popcorn.gif
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:06 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:12 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 07:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 17:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 18:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-15 07:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:11 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
Re: +1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-13 02:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Especially considering that not only are the main characters usually male (and when they aren't, the fandom tends to be het or femslash focused, and be more about the female characters, imagine that!) but even the minor characters, especially the ones with popular archetypal traits tend to be male as well.
Speaking of canons that usually have fandoms, that is.
Second, I think it's silly to judge people on the basis on what they ship. I can love a character without shipping them with anyone, I promise! I have several canons in which I don't even ship my favourite character. It's sad and confusing (and stupid) that one can be called misogynistic simply by not shipping a female character.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 08:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 16:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:32 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:06 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:11 (UTC) - ExpandAnother DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 01:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Another DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:32 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:31 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 14:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Another DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Another DA
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:51 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-13 02:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 01:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
I agree with you, that labeling a focus on male characters and squeeing henceforth isn't misogyny (perhaps chauvinism is a batter word?). The bashing of female characters, however (and I do note that you qualified it as "unfortunate") I WOULD consider misogyny.
And a side question that comes out of your very generous offer (:p): do you consider everyone who enjoys any yaoi manga to be fetishing you? (because when I beam at the characters in, say, Crimson Spell and cheer for their romance, I do so not because it's two men, but because it's two people who are overcoming obstacles together and discovering how much they mean to each other. To some of us, the hearts and souls are the important part: the genitalia are incidental.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 13:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:51 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Um, but because we've been a wankfest recently I don't know if other people will be just as tired by this secret or are still revving to go. Luckily, I have a plan.
Run away!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 01:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:15 pm (UTC)(link)OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
i came for wank over the first part. i'm staying for the wank over the last part.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I don't get why you're going on about being a IRL yaoi though??? why does it matter you're asian.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-11 23:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 17:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)I very much prefer to live vicariously through the adventures of other women. I therefore wish there was more women to focus on in fiction and fandom. Unfortunately, it's a self-perpetuating cycle; people focus more on the men because there aren't as many interesting women characters, and therefore fandoms give us more men to focus on because that's where all the attention is at.
Being gay doesn't make you special in this respect, especially with terming it "likely" mansplaining - there's nothing "likely" about it, anything more than misogyny is "unfortunate". And I bet that attitude follows you back into real life.
You go right on ahead and squeal over the flawless perfection of various guys, and continue to participate in the cycle as just another part of the problem.
(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 09:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-11 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)I cannot even tell you how many times I have heard this exact same argument to "justify" bashing POC, people with disabilities, etc. etc. both fictional and in real life. "Oh, it's nothing personal, I just don't want to see their disgusting [ loathsome racial slur ] face every day, so I would never hire/vote for/befriend them, but I can't help what I find attractive!"
And yes, before I became an adult I never believed this could be used to justify hiring or political decisions, but it happens behind closed doors all the time, in my personal day to day experience. "Wouldn't want an ugly person of color with no sex appeal representing the company. Nothing personal, but white people just have the charisma we are looking for. We want to bedazzle the customers with some eye candy, here!"
Sorry, but it hurts, and hearing it all the damn time in real life, I am sick of it.
I might argue that you shouldn't cruelly bash another human being because you don't personally want to screw them, but I guess that's too much to ask.
So, dear troll, you wanted wank, and here you go. Nicely gift wrapped just for you! Although seriously, thanks for giving me an excuse to vent.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
But focusing on hot guys is one thing. Writing diatribes about how any female love interest for one of those guys is an 'ugly stupid whore' with ulterior motives is another. Specifically, it's sexism at best and misogyny at worst. This doesn't mean that fandom doesn't have its great points - I actually think that the fact fandom is so self aware of issues like this is one of them, SJW and anti-SJW trolling aside. Instead, it just means that fandom doesn't exist in a vacuum (and couldn't by definition, and shouldn't), and therefore shouldn't be immune to criticism.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 00:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:07 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:00 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:31 am (UTC)(link)IDG the ruckus over misogyny. The amount of egregious female character-bashing is way overhyped, IMO.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 12:39 am (UTC)(link)I'm glad that you've found a place that's welcoming and accepting, and think that's awesome! But that space does sometimes need to be criticized for it's treatment of female characters or f/f romance.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:06 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 01:36 am (UTC)(link)But that's not the same as "I want the two guys to be together, so the worthless female whore should just die". Many men who bash on other guys for "getting" the woman they were after are pissed the other guy got the prize and not them.
While many fangirls who bash the hardest on female characters are pissed at the female character just for existing and "ruining" the "secretly canon" gay ship.
You can't really compare the two.
Now, if guys would usually say "omg, this disgusting slut of a useless male char! I hope he dies of ass cancer for forcing femaleA and femaleB apart! He isn't a good char anyways because he is way too strong. I wish they'd kill him off in a very brutal way" THEN we could talk.
But otherwise... eh, I'm pretty sure I have never seen someone calling out a GAY DUDE who focuses a lot on hot male characters.
I only see women get called out on that.
So I don't even get why you think that fandom ISN'T perfectly functioning as your save space for all things sexy and male.
I simply can't believe that you get called a "misogynist" for being gay.
Because "why do you hate to FUCK women?" isn't the same as "why do you hate women?".
OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:04 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-04-12 02:11 am (UTC)(link)Straight slash fangirls are usually insecure because most of the time they aren't "cool kids." They might think they're not attractive enough or they might get bullied. That's why they read m/m and bash female characters. It makes them feel "safe," and they're able to vicariously get back at their bullies/society.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 02:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
Re: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
Re: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 13:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 03:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 17:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:21 (UTC) - ExpandAYRT
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 17:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
Re: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 05:07 (UTC) - ExpandAYRT
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 17:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 18:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AYRT
Re: forgive me OP, for using this to jumpstart a discussion
AYRT
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 18:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 07:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 04:58 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 14:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 06:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 07:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 07:12 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 15:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 15:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-12 13:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-04-16 04:53 (UTC) - Expand