[ SECRET POST #2296 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2296 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 056 secrets from Secret Submission Post #328.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

This is Tony Stark we're talking about

[nyxelestia]

At the very least, it's probably not much worse than, say, the average airline carrier. (Still bad, but, y'know...)

Though personally, I assumed it would run off technology similar to Tony's arc reactor (and/or it gains energy from stuff indirectly connected to Tony's kind of clean energy).

Don't worry, OP, the guy who made that thing is "kind of the only name in clean energy, right now", I'm sure it's okay. ;)

Re: This is Tony Stark we're talking about

[(Anonymous)]

Eh? I didn't think Tony built the Helicarrier. If he built it, why did he have to hack it longhand when he came aboard? You'd think if he built the thing he'd have built himself a backdoor.

Rebuild it after the movie, however, I could see that. It was kind of in bits by the time Clint, Loki and the Hulk got through with it.

Re: This is Tony Stark we're talking about

[(Anonymous)]

According to comics canon, Tony and Reed Richards (and some other X-dude whose name escapes me) designed the thing. OTOH, considering how recalcitrant movie Tony was about handing his tech over to the US government, whose side he's ostensibly on, I'm not sure how sanguine he'd be about handing it over to Fury, whom he neither likes nor trusts.

It runs on handwavium. That's all we need to know.

Re: This is Tony Stark we're talking about

[(Anonymous)]

Given what I know about aircraft carriers that stay in water (this anon lived on one, they're dirty as a used tampon and I promise you there's still conventional fuel involved, if only for the jets), all I can really say is that damn thing looks like an unholy maintenance NIGHTMARE and that it's completely unfeasible in every way (how do you do trash or sewage disposal on that thing?), but it looks damn cool anyway.

And the Rule of Cool is pretty much all that you need for CGI and Marvel.

Re: This is Tony Stark we're talking about

[nyxelestia]

Fury saves the garbage and sewage to dump on enemies...and people who irritate him, when he's all invisible and thousands of feet in the air. :P

Re: This is Tony Stark we're talking about

[(Anonymous)]

How do they dispose of the sewage? Easy, fly over Jersey and then open the tanks. Not like anyone would notice any more shit landing on Jersey.