case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-04-23 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2303 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2303 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 048 secrets from Secret Submission Post #329.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 2 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2013-04-24 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
You can just post this as a new comment and then nobody can say shit about the length because case said threads that follow GC are allowed to be as long and spammy as we like. It's where we hold our .gif parties. Just something to keep in mind.

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

(Anonymous) 2013-04-24 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
That makes perfectly logical sense but unfortunately the people who make these threads are really, really opposed to the idea and they get really snarky at even the suggestion, for reasons that are completely unknown to my understanding. they seem to view it as some kind of weird insult or something

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2013-04-24 01:21 am (UTC)(link)
Honestly I don't care either way. I think it's hilarious that either side gives a fuck.

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

(Anonymous) 2013-04-24 01:31 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't seen this reaction you speak of, but you seem to keep popping up and complaining about the reaction. :/

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

(Anonymous) 2013-04-24 01:35 am (UTC)(link)
That's what I was thinking. :/ I keep seeing these anons complaining about mysterious other reactionary anons. Odd.

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

(Anonymous) 2013-04-24 02:47 am (UTC)(link)
I remember a few months or so ago somebody accidentally posted a thread outside the GC and then did an informal poll to see if people actually clicked the "page 2" button, which would make that thread visible, or if they just clicked the "general comments" link, which would not.

An overwhelming majority said they just clicked the GC link. So, maybe y'all have awesome .gif parties, but the fact I've never noticed them, combined with that polling, at least speaks to the possibility that posting outside General Comments is not necessarily just as good or better than posting within.

Re: Nonfandom secrets!

[personal profile] anonymouslyyours 2013-04-24 03:03 am (UTC)(link)
Throw up a link in GC? I dunno. Part of me is pleased at the idea I can hold secretive threads under everyone's nose right on page two tho.