case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-02 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2312 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2312 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________






















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 018 secrets from Secret Submission Post #330.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 2 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
ginainthekingsroad: Walter's flights of fancy; Astrid eyeroll (Fringe- Walter & Astrid (Story Time))

Re: Pet Peeve Tropes?

[personal profile] ginainthekingsroad 2013-05-03 01:59 am (UTC)(link)
On the story telling side: Omnidisciplinary Scientists without a good justification for it, especially very young human ones without powers. So for example I would say the Doctor and Walter Bishop would get a pass; but on those same shows Liz Shaw and Peter Bishop possess skills far beyond the reasonable for their years even for the sf genre. And all the omnidisciplinary scientists on crime/procedural shows are even worse because the bar of suspended disbelief is way lower.

On the film-making side: Excessive shaky cam. I have a higher tolerance for it than some people (my mom), and I think it can be used to great effect, but there is a definite line between handheld immediacy and handheld CONFUSION. I couldn't get into Southland because the shaky cam and randomly desaturated filters were so unappealing.