case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-04 03:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #2314 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2314 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 09:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Read a lot of SJW ranting which claims to be analysis. Every "analysis" is basically the same, starting from the position of assuming misogyny then cherry picking out of context quotes or making up allusions to justify the accusation.

Basically it is all bullshit. You could make the most ardent ally look bad with the same tactics.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt

No. Really, no, it is not "all bullshit". A lot of SJWs have a lot of very good valid points, they just undermine them because they just have to run it off a cliff and mix those good points with cherry-picking ranting and blow it all up into a bigger deal than it is. There's a lot of legit sexist shit in the stuff he writes. Starting with River Song's entire character arc, but not restricted to that. I'm not even sure I can cover all of it, since a lot of his sexism is due to his patterns.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Or you could be creating patterns to justify the starting position. I'd want something a bit more than patterns.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
People with prejudice will see patterns that support their prejudice. Well known bit of human psychology. That is why you see a pattern of sexism in his work. It is because you want to.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Why the hell would you WANT to see sexism in his work? What?
Nope, pretty sure I actually wanted to continue loving my favourite show, actually.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
And those who think he's an "ardent ally" have no predjudices whatever? Sure.