case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-04 03:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #2314 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2314 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)
nayrt

No. Really, no, it is not "all bullshit". A lot of SJWs have a lot of very good valid points, they just undermine them because they just have to run it off a cliff and mix those good points with cherry-picking ranting and blow it all up into a bigger deal than it is. There's a lot of legit sexist shit in the stuff he writes. Starting with River Song's entire character arc, but not restricted to that. I'm not even sure I can cover all of it, since a lot of his sexism is due to his patterns.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Or you could be creating patterns to justify the starting position. I'd want something a bit more than patterns.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-04 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
People with prejudice will see patterns that support their prejudice. Well known bit of human psychology. That is why you see a pattern of sexism in his work. It is because you want to.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 12:35 am (UTC)(link)
Why the hell would you WANT to see sexism in his work? What?
Nope, pretty sure I actually wanted to continue loving my favourite show, actually.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 06:50 am (UTC)(link)
And those who think he's an "ardent ally" have no predjudices whatever? Sure.