case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-04 03:14 pm

[ SECRET POST #2314 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2314 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 096 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - posted twice ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-05-05 02:45 am (UTC)(link)
I think she's sayin that she thinks there's a line? Like its okay to come up with cool head canons but don't be too elaborate about it?

Idk that doesn't make sense either really.
kluify: (Default)

[personal profile] kluify 2013-05-05 03:01 am (UTC)(link)
On rereading I worked out that I think she's just saying what would be appropriate for people to post on her site, as in what 'crosses the line' over into fanfic. Still don't know why one is okay and the other definitively isn't though. I mean, I can guess, but I still think the onus is on her to actually explain her objections properly.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 04:50 am (UTC)(link)
Yes that's just weird and vague as hell.

One is simple speculation and the other is actually adding to the world and putting words into a character's mouth, but there are better ways to show the difference between writing an actual narrative and speculation.

Good grief.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 09:13 pm (UTC)(link)
This is one of those times I wish these sites had a "like" button. Or something similar.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
I would bet a lot of money it's a legal thing. Because if the scenario is specific rather than generic, and she later uses a similar storyline, the person who posted it on her site can claim that she stole it from them & try and make a ton of money in court. I don't know about this specific instance but that's usually the impetus behind this kind of thing.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-05 02:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Then why doesn't she just say that for legal reasons she cannot read any fan fiction posted on any site, and will return all manuscripts unread if mailed to her, and will delete all proposed manuscripts unread if emailed?