case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-05-09 07:11 pm

[ SECRET POST #2319 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2319 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[The Slum Cat - Ernest Seton Thompson]


__________________________________________________



03.
[Mass Effect]


__________________________________________________



04.
[The Hunger Games]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Ib]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Family Guy]


__________________________________________________



07.
[The West Wing]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Labyrinth]


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________




















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #331.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-09 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm not sure I like the implication here that killing off a certain character makes the writer a bad person.

Don't know the source material but that seems... unlikely? Odd? An absurd overreaction?

(Anonymous) 2013-05-10 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
mainly because that one particular character was carrying almost the entire comic

(Anonymous) 2013-05-10 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
That might make it a shitty creative choice, but I don't think it makes it a morally bad decision. I mean, I'm pretty sure that's not how it works.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-10 01:04 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know if that's why the OP is saying the writer is a shitty person. I read it as 'This person is shitty, so I'm glad their famous comic is going down in flames' than 'You killed this character! You are a shitty person!'.

DA, btw.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-10 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
The specific part that is most odd to me is "The artist is a good person, though" - the implication of which seems to be that the writer isn't. I'm probably just making too much of it, but I really can't think of any other way to construe it, especially in combination with the rest of the secret.

(Anonymous) 2013-05-10 02:29 am (UTC)(link)
Well... a lot of times artist and writers in collabs have little to do with each other. It may even be a commission type deal(I don't know in this case, but there are some)

(Anonymous) 2013-05-10 03:30 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

What the anon above me said - the artist might have little to nothing to with the writing, and/or they might come across as a far nicer person [and possibly work on other comics as well, so this one crashing and burning wouldn't effect them as much as it would the writer.]