Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-13 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2323 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2323 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 069 secrets from Secret Submission Post #332.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
I would agree with the first comment up there on all counts, though - chances are, most writers are not doing it to "cash in" or to mock. You don't have to believe in a religion or adopt it as your own to appreciate its stories, messages, myths, and symbolism.
Further, for an add of asshole-remark, an atheist (which I'm not), could argue that all religion is fiction and/or fantasy, and drawing from those old stories and themes is no different from drawing from any other themes.
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-05-13 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)"I didn't mean all writers, and I didn't mean the general themes that people are referring to above. I meant the authors (mostly fan authors) who either brag about their atheism or bash religion.
Religion gets a LOT of hate on the internet, so it's frustrating that the only time it can be discussed is in fiction, because you can then dismiss it as fiction (I hear the term "kid's stories" often)."
Re: OP
Yeah, when I started writing my comment, there was literally only one other comment posted. Slow me. :-/
I'm borderline agnostic-atheist. I pretty much think people who brag about their atheism / bash religion are just angry and haven't sorted their own shit out yet.
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-05-14 12:45 am (UTC)(link)Belief in a higher power =/= religion.
I'm no member of any church, cult, clan, what have you and I also don't have holy texts that tell me what to do. And yet I believe.
Just because there are good people who in turn do good via using their religion doesn't mean relidion itself can't be heavily critisized or "bashed" as you call it.
Also, religious texts can be "dismissed" as fiction just fine as we still lack evidence for 90% of the things that took place according to them.
Oddly enough, while the Holy Bible (but I forgot which version/translation) mentions that unicorns are real, all Christians I know would laugh at me if I told them I believed in unicorns. Because that's just humbug. Unlike a guy who walked on water and turned water into wine or a guy who heard a donkey talk to him (yup, that's in the HB as well).
Re: OP
(Anonymous) 2013-05-14 01:12 am (UTC)(link)And yes,
slightly tangential
(Anonymous) 2013-05-14 01:21 am (UTC)(link)And I do strongly believe that religion MUST be criticized in order for reform to be possible. We can't just tiptoe around matters that seriously need to be addressed. How else would progress be possible?
Re: slightly tangential
(Anonymous) 2013-05-14 10:12 am (UTC)(link)Re: slightly tangential
(Anonymous) 2013-05-14 12:26 pm (UTC)(link)Re: slightly tangential